-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Bump Arm build to ARMv8 #2940
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump Arm build to ARMv8 #2940
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
AUTOMERGE: (FAIL)
|
McGiverGim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not too sure if we need to remove armv7 support or support both. The only difference I suppose is the downloadUrl?
|
Raspberry Pi 3 can run on ARMv8 kernel not sure about other platforms. |
|
The original PR is here: #1024 @nmaggioni please, can you help with this? |
|
The latest NW.JS community builds should be compatible with both ARMv7 and v8, but as far as I understood (and already linked to HN by @haslinghuis) it will be down to the specific hardware implementations to properly support them or not. |
gulpfile.js
Outdated
| } | ||
| const downloadedArchivePath = `${versionFolder}/nwjs${flavorPostfix}-v${nwArmVersion}-linux-arm.tar.gz`; | ||
| const downloadUrl = `https://github.com/LeonardLaszlo/nw.js-armv7-binaries/releases/download/v${nwArmVersion}/nwjs${flavorDownloadPostfix}-v${nwArmVersion}-linux-arm.tar.gz`; | ||
| const downloadUrl = 'https://github.com/LeonardLaszlo/nw.js-armv7-binaries/releases/download/nw60-arm64_2022-01-08/nw60-arm64_2022-01-08.tar.gz'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardcoding SDK URLs deep down in the build code is almost never a good idea, especially if prospecting to have multiple builds branch out of this one. I'd keep the modular URL approach even if needs to be simplified to a single global var.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.
d5a114b to
3f0a456
Compare
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
|
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: |








Fixes: #2882
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27277351