-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
review checklist #788
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
review checklist #788
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the pull request template by appending a new checklist section at the end. This checklist outlines several verification items for contributors to confirm before submitting a pull request, using markdown checkboxes for each item. No other changes or removals were made to the template. Changes
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 30th. To opt out, configure Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
I noticed in this comment that checkmarks are easy to click and change, so my concern is any that public or unauthorized user could modify. thoughts/corrections? edit: seems the text can be modified directly to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
23-29: Enhance checklist clarity and enforce gating
The new markdown checkboxes provide a nice visual reminder, but they can be manually toggled by any user with edit access to the PR description. Consider:
- Updating the header to explicitly state “All boxes must be checked before merge” or similar.
- Automating enforcement using a GitHub Action that scans PR bodies and fails the check run if any items remain unchecked.
- Optionally capturing more detail per item (e.g., links to schematics review sign-off or hardware test logs) to improve traceability.
This will turn the checklist from a passive guideline into an actionable, enforceable requirement.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
|
nice stuff |

adds to the
pull_request_template.md:Summary by CodeRabbit