-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
Closed
Labels
A-MathFundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operationsFundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operationsC-FeatureA new feature, making something new possibleA new feature, making something new possibleD-TrivialNice and easy! A great choice to get started with BevyNice and easy! A great choice to get started with Bevy
Description
What problem does this solve or what need does it fill?
The RFC mentions a few primitive shapes like Wedge or Cone that are not included in bevy_math::primitives or that do not implement bevy_render::mesh::Meshable and cannot be used as shapes for Meshes.
Coneis implemented inbevy_mathand can be used as a gizmo but not as aMeshprimitive.Wedgeis not implemented anywhere.
What solution would you like?
Add Wedge to bevy_math and implement Meshable for both.
What alternative(s) have you considered?
Implement Meshable for Cone and don't add Wedge at all.
Additional context
I think Ramp would be a better name for the Wedge shape as described in the RFC mentioned above because not every wedge is a ramp and not every ramp is a wedge.
- The left shape is a valid ramp, but not a wedge (This shape conforms to what is described in the RFC)
- The right shape is a valid wedge but not a ramp.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-MathFundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operationsFundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operationsC-FeatureA new feature, making something new possibleA new feature, making something new possibleD-TrivialNice and easy! A great choice to get started with BevyNice and easy! A great choice to get started with Bevy
