Home

BHCP

Beyond Human-Centric Programming (BHCP) is an experiment in making intent, authority, limits, and required evidence first-class program meaning. A person states what must be true and what may happen; machines remain free to discover an acceptable execution without silently weakening the contract.

BHCP is early but executable. The repository is not claiming a complete language, planner, runtime, or SDK.

Current maturity

• Newly implemented: the generic proof checker from #117, PR #150, and the precedence correction in #151 / PR #153 revalidates complete obligation closures, sealed reducer derivations, structural child premises, four-state evidence, policy minima, verifier authority, and exact per-execution-instance claims/items/gaps without behavior-specific proof tags. The retained reducer composes child outcomes while parent-local obligations combine under Refuted > Faulted > Unresolved > Satisfied. State/execution graph construction, planning, runtime enforcement, and final evidence-graph assembly remain roadmap work.
• Feature negotiation reconciled: #148 and PR #152 advertise the exact obligation- and capability-builder feature identifiers emitted by real graph artifacts, with executable checks that keep state/execution construction, planning, runtime enforcement, and final evidence assembly unclaimed.
• Implemented: a safe-Rust canonical-source slice; complete deterministic AST parsing for v0 type, general function, predicate, and standalone refinement definitions from #100, complete goal headers, clauses, cases, calls, quantification, and nested compositions from #101, and closed policy, waiver, syntax/profile, and derived/native extension definitions from #102; the closed v0 value/type checker from #103, including canonical forms, generic bounds, nominal/structural subtyping, candidate-bound refinements, exact numerics, closed references, and recursive checked Dynamic boundaries; the complete total-pure S5 wire expression and pattern calculus from #104, including immutable construction, exact and checked numeric operations, exhaustive matching, casts, collections, and finite quantification; deterministic source-defined function/predicate elaboration from #105, including bounded generic specialization, alpha-normalized bindings, canonical verifier configuration, and fail-closed retained-call resolution; pre-IR ownership/resource analysis from #106, including exact handle qualifiers and lifetimes, move/borrow/share crossings, topology-aware concurrency, affine/linear joins, persistent-retention checks, and canonical runtime handle references; effect/authority analysis from #107, including deterministic possible-effect rows, child propagation, typed resource projection, deny-wins ceilings, policy-scoped authority, unsafe/foreign evidence gaps, direct exact limits, compatible preference groups, and retained-IR revalidation; derived/native extension resolution from #110 and PR #145, including total-pure checked lowering, reducer specialization and bound checks, exact must-understand native retention, semantic identity, and adversarial retained-IR validation; the shared typed graph identity, validation, deterministic encoding, and inspection boundary from #113; complete deterministic structural-obligation graph construction from retained semantic IR from #114, including requirements, guarantees, retained invariants and cases, verifier bindings, discharge dependencies, and exact effective-policy requirement/evidence/limit obligations; and deterministic capability-decision graph construction from #115, including exact request/resource projection, authored and policy ceilings, deny-wins context, waiver provenance, required unsafe/foreign/unsupported gaps, and one validated allow decision per execution-eligible effect; typed canonical AST and semantic IR; deterministic CBOR; SHA3-512 algorithm-tagged identities; CDDL validation; a minimal reducer kernel; self-hosted all, homogeneous-output any, none, typed causal chain, and unary typed gate with complete algebra conformance; a contract-bounded bhcp verify project-registry path; a capability-bounded local verifier process runner; deterministic targeted evidence bundles; a fail-closed coding-agent experiment controller; monotonic layered policy with scoped, expiring, auditable waivers; the audited bounded presentation-profile layer; and the machine-checked practical-v0 completion contract and reference program from #99. Complete source-to-IR coverage, the remaining state graph and proof audit, planner budget/retry allocation, runtime enforcement, and complete execution remain roadmap work.
• Measured: the Phase 2 audit classifies six pilots, four multi-seed attempts, and one registered-evidence forward run without retroactive promotion. The hardened registered results are valid negatives: 0/5 contextual-policy candidates and 0/1 in-session-evidence candidates accepted. The later preregistered studies also returned null results: positive registered-adapter use and acceptance were 0/12 in #92, while both prose and BHCP arms accepted 0/12 in #93; all 24 comparative claims were conservatively calibrated. These small, single-model studies support neither an advantage nor equivalence.
• Roadmap: Phases 1–4, the separate evidence-generalization milestone, and the fast required-CI milestone are reviewed, merged, and closed. #97 cut protected test feedback from 38:01 to about five minutes without dropping a target; PR #143 completed its full hosted matrix in about three minutes. In the open v0 — End-to-end constrained execution milestone, the frozen completion contract through effect/authority analysis #99–#107, policy/waiver and extension lowering #108 and #110, the shared typed graph foundation #113, structural obligation graph construction #114, capability graph construction #115, generic complete-obligation-graph proof checking #117, its outcome-precedence correction #151, and exact graph-builder feature negotiation #148 are reviewed and merged. Profile lowering #109 and recursion/retention lowering #111 remain dependency-unblocked subject to their declared concurrency tokens. Cross-graph audit #118 and evidence-graph assembly #126 retain other open native blockers. BHCP v0 remains incomplete until the remaining implementations and their evidence are reviewed and merged.

Start here

• Purpose — the problem, intended users, success measures, and non-goals.
• Architecture and Approaches — the semantic pipeline and minimal trusted core.
• Development and Operations — the Rust toolchain, quality gates, and current operational limits.
• Roadmap and Agentic Workflow — live milestones, dependencies, claims, review, and merge rules.
• Decisions and Interesting Bits — concise decisions and experiment findings.

The repository remains the source of truth: README, vision, normative semantics, CDDL bundle, and conformance catalog.