100% Win Rate?!! How Does This Bot Do it?

[gabinasky-78]

Reference issue: #947

@Fruitfella
@binary-ex-machina
@lasaidhari
@Hooponopono
@hotmatrixx
@AlienFly
@murali139
@baruga
@ghost

Please guys, I know binary-ex-machina already gave his opinion on the issue as referenced above. But this bot seems to be able to achieve a win rate of 100% (see video link below). My question is this:

What is the logic behind the purchase conditions for the bot? Its a puzzle I've been trying in vain to solve for some time now. It looks so simple, yet so mysterious to me. I know the definitions for the "points" must be in a "This block is called on every tick" section, but still a hard nut for me to crack.

Why I'm asking the masters in the house to help me here.

(For more clarification see video as posted by bot creator on YouTube: https://youtu.be/puvBvzvEQ0I

And see image below as regarding what I refer to:

Will really appreciate your feedbacks

[thommmaz]

100% win rate is easy if you only have 50 runs..lol. Let the bot run at least few thousand runs.

Look at his youtube channel. He has tons of this kind of "grail" bots for high price to sell. Why you need lot of different bots if according to their story all their bots are "money machines" ? :D

[gabinasky-78]

100% win rate is easy if you only have 50 runs..lol. Let the bot run at least few thousand runs.

Look at his youtube channel. He has tons of this kind of "grail" bots for high price to sell. Why you need lot of different bots if according to their story all their bots are "money machines" ? :D

@thommmaz I get your point. But my interest is really not in the validity or performance of the bot, but rather the logic behind the purchase order as shown in the screenshot above (also see video).

You'll agree with me that it looks rather strange and simplified. But trying to decode it has proven rather tough & mystifying. Why I'm asking if anyone can "solve the riddle". If you can pls share. Thanks

[thommmaz]

First guess is it's some sort of ema's crossing system. 6 moving averages with distance less than 0.2 between each other and slowest average has to be bigger than fastest which usually means start of down trend. So it looks logical to make lower trade.

[gabinasky-78]

First guess is it's some sort of ema's crossing system. 6 moving averages with distance less than 0.2 between each other and slowest average has to be bigger than fastest which usually means start of down trend. So it looks logical to make lower trade.

Nice idea bro. Worth trying out. Though my own guess is the points have to do with tick movements since from the video the trade duration is in ticks, not in minutes. Possibly, each point represents the difference btw 2 ticks, or something like that.