Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
Needs copyright attribution. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You dont need this tag if you indent the code block 4 spaces in
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
BIP 009 |
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
bip-0009.mediawiki
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called called "soft forks") being deployed in parallel
allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called called "soft forks") to be deployed in parallel
s/being/to be/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
฿tcDrak notifications@github.com writes:
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+
- BIP: 9
- Title: Version bits with timeout and delay
- Author: Pieter Wuille pieter.wuille@gmail.com, Peter Todd pete@petertodd.org, Greg Maxwell greg@xiph.org, Rusty Russell rusty@rustcorp.com.au
- Status: Draft
- Type: Informational Track
- Created: 2015-10-04
+
+==Abstract==
+
+This document specifies a proposed change to the semantics of the 'version' field in Bitcoin blocks, allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called called "soft forks") being deployed in parallel. It relies on interpreting the version field as a bit vector, where each bit can be used to track an independent change. These are tallied each retarget period. Once the consensus change succeeds or times out, there is a "fallow" pause after which the bit can be reused for later changes.allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called called "soft forks") being deployed in parallel
allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called called "soft forks") to be deployed in parallel
s/being/to be/
And s/called called/called/ :)
Thanks,
Rusty.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-September/010998.html
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell rusty@rustcorp.com.au