Add BIP109 to BIP9 Deployments#396
Add BIP109 to BIP9 Deployments#396chriswheeler wants to merge 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom chriswheeler:bip9-deployments-bip109
Conversation
|
This is incorrect. BIP109 prescribes its own activation mechanism which is different from BIP9-- it uses the old IsSuperMajority rolling test. |
|
The implementation is based on an earlier version of BIP9 - but still I think it would be useful to show somewhere since its using one of the available bits, and is being actively mined on main net. Could we add a note, or column to the table to convey this? Or a separate table for deployments which are not fully compatible with the current BIP9? |
|
BIP9 has never been about more than softforks, and BIP 109 is not that. Another table with potential conflicts might be useful, but nothing more IMO. |
|
Interpreting @gmaxwell 's comment and lack of revisions here as a NACK; closing. Ping me if someone wants it reopened. |
3 participants
No description provided.