BIP75 Update: Versioning, Cancellation, Unknown Message Type, New PKI_TYPEs, Status Codes, Motivation#439
Merged
luke-jr merged 18 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom Aug 31, 2016
Merged
Conversation
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary, # especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch. # # Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts # the commit.
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary, # especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch. # # Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts # the commit.
…o and BIP75 text (based on suggestions from http://androiddevblog.com/protocol-buffers-pitfall-adding-enum-values/) - Update BIP75 Motivation and use cases to provide more color around reasoning and use of BIP75 NOTE: The BIP75 language no longer contains a description of the KYC compliance use case, as it is a single, very specific use-case that does not have any bearing on the technical specifications herein. BIP75 extends the original BIP70 Payment Protocol to become a two-way, encrypted messaging process, which can be used for a variety of reasons one of which is regulatory compliance.
Added additional pki_type values
Added versioning, canceling
Added: - Versioning - Cancellation - Add UNKNOWN_TYPE to ProtocolMessageType enum in paymentrequest.proto and BIP75 text (based on suggestions from http://androiddevblog.com/protocol-buffers-pitfall-adding-enum-values/) Updated: - Additional pki_type values - Updated status_code values - Update BIP75 Motivation and use cases to provide more color around reasoning and use of BIP75 NOTE: The BIP75 language no longer contains a description of the KYC compliance use case, as it is a single, very specific use-case that does not have any bearing on the technical specifications herein. BIP75 extends the original BIP70 Payment Protocol to become a two-way, encrypted messaging process, which can be used for a variety of reasons one of which is regulatory compliance.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added:
Updated:
NOTE: The BIP75 language no longer contains a description of the KYC compliance use case, as it is a single, very specific use-case that does not have any bearing on the technical specifications herein. BIP75 extends the original BIP70 Payment Protocol to become a two-way, encrypted messaging process, which can be used for a variety of reasons one of which is regulatory compliance.