Skip to content

Slight clarification for replacement implementation#488

Merged
luke-jr merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
instagibbs:rbffixup
Nov 6, 2017
Merged

Slight clarification for replacement implementation#488
luke-jr merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
instagibbs:rbffixup

Conversation

@instagibbs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Grouped the two sections explaining the fee evaluation, then removed a redundant clause in the middle of the latter paragraph that confused the meaning.

@harding @petertodd ping authors

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@harding harding left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nano-nit that can be optionally fixed or left as-is as far as I'm concerned. Otherwise LGTM. Thanks!

# The replacement transaction does not contain any new unconfirmed inputs that did not previously appear in the mempool. (Unconfirmed inputs are inputs spending outputs from currently unconfirmed transactions.)

# The replacement transaction must pay for its own bandwidth in addition to the amount paid by the original transactions at or above the rate set by the node's minimum relay fee setting. For example, if the minimum relay fee is 1 satoshi/byte and the replacement transaction is 500 bytes total, then the replacement must pay a fee at least 500 satoshis higher than the sum of the originals.
# The replacement transaction pays an absolute fee at least the sum paid by the original transactions.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"an absolute fee at least" -> "an absolute fee of at least" (sounds better to my ears, but either way seems fine)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right, updating

@jonathancross
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@luke-jr This is ready to merge.

@luke-jr luke-jr merged commit 35ca008 into bitcoin:master Nov 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants