BIP 149: Segregated Witness (second deployment)#526
BIP 149: Segregated Witness (second deployment)#526luke-jr merged 5 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom shaolinfry:bip-segwit-uasf
Conversation
bip-segwit-uasf.mediawiki
Outdated
|
|
||
| ==Deployment== | ||
|
|
||
| This BIP will be deployed by BIP8 with the name "uasegwit" and using bit 2. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be best to keep "segwit" as the name here, if only deployment strategy is changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's unclear to be if each BIP9 deployment needs a completely different common name or not, but in any case, since we need a new service bit, I think there has to be a new name anyway. I'm going to leave this as is for the time being.
bip-segwit-uasf.mediawiki
Outdated
|
|
||
| ==Rationale== | ||
|
|
||
| This BIP can be deployed well in advance of the BIP8 '''starttime''' so that the '''timeout''' will be sufficiently far in the future to allow Bitcoin users to uprgade in preparation. |
bip-segwit-uasf.mediawiki
Outdated
|
|
||
| ==Deployment== | ||
|
|
||
| This BIP will be deployed by BIP8 with the name "uasegwit" and using bit 2. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Normally bits aren't assigned until the proposal leaves Draft stage (at least in principle) I think? (There's also an allocations file that would need updating)
Considering that there may be changes to the proposal before re-deployment, it is probably better not to give the impression it is ready for implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changed to TBD. Will update deployments file once there is an actual deployment.
bip-segwit-uasf.mediawiki
Outdated
|
|
||
| ==Deployment== | ||
|
|
||
| This BIP will be deployed by BIP8 with the name "uasegwit" and using bit TBD. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that a new name will require redeployment of mining software.
|
Should be good to go now. |
|
Use BIP 149. Title currently exceeds 44 character limit. |
No description provided.