Skip to content

Remove second service bit from NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED/BIP159#592

Merged
luke-jr merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
jonasschnelli:node_network_limited
Sep 23, 2017
Merged

Remove second service bit from NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED/BIP159#592
luke-jr merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
jonasschnelli:node_network_limited

Conversation

@jonasschnelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This removes the split between NODE_NETWORK_LOW|HIGH and reduced the specification to a single signalling bit (bit 10) NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED with a min height of 288 blocks.

The implementation has already been updated: bitcoin/bitcoin#10387

Comment thread bip-0159.mediawiki Outdated
all historical blocks.
# Pruned peers can relay blocks, headers, transactions, addresses and can serve a limited number of historical blocks, thus they should have a way how to announce their service(s)
# Peers no longer in initial block download should consider connection some of its outbound connections to pruned peers to allow other peers to bootstrap from non-pruned peers
# Peers no longer in initial block download should consider connect some of its outbound connections to pruned peers to allow other peers to bootstrap from non-pruned peers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

connecting*

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Fixed.

@jonasschnelli jonasschnelli force-pushed the node_network_limited branch 2 times, most recently from 2b4df79 to b5236f3 Compare September 23, 2017 15:21
@jonasschnelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed also the README file.

@luke-jr luke-jr merged commit 7fccc60 into bitcoin:master Sep 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants