Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transaction details shows wrong To: when multiple outputs to same wallet #1725

Closed
sgornick opened this issue Aug 26, 2012 · 3 comments · Fixed by #4238
Closed

Transaction details shows wrong To: when multiple outputs to same wallet #1725

sgornick opened this issue Aug 26, 2012 · 3 comments · Fixed by #4238

Comments

@sgornick
Copy link

If there is a transaction where my wallet holds two of the output addresses, then the Transaction details dialog shows incorrect data.

The To: for both addresses will show the same address (and label) regardless of which of the two I am viewing.

Bitcoin-qt, v0.6.3.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Aug 26, 2012

They show the same information, because Transaction details shows the details of the underlying Bitcoin transaction, not the specific sub-transaction (output). This is by design.

However, it is a bug if the To: only shows one address instead of both.

@veox
Copy link

veox commented May 30, 2013

Is this still present/relevant?

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented May 30, 2013

Looking at the code in TransactionDesc, it only shows one "To:" address for the first To, even if a transaction has multiple outputs

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/transactiondesc.cpp#L111

So this could indeed be regarded a very minor bug, though it shows all the outputs (along with the amount) later on, so it's not that the information is not there.

@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants