Aligning type naming with bitcoind and fixed pubkeyhash bug #125
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we get some test cases to cover the added types?
Contributor
Author
|
@weilu I added tests for nulldata(OP_RETURN) as well as multisig |
weilu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2014
Aligning type naming with bitcoind and fixed pubkeyhash bug
Contributor
|
Thanks! @sidazhang |
weilu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2014
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All tests pass with the modifications. I noticed a few other bugs. But I want to get this pull request reviewed first before I move further as this is my first pull request to this repo.
Conventions:
The script types are currently:
https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/src/script.js#L117-L133
Bitcoind uses these following names:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script.cpp#L75-L87
Bug:
https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/src/script.js#L123-L127
It is possible for the third item in a pubkeyhash script to be a 00 (push zero byte of data), for example in this transaction:
e.g.:
http://testnet.helloblock.io/transactions/a347b4ef02173b74deb096921d8306ff7c379c254e9febaa040024b220a348ed
One of the output scripts: 76a90088ac
The above is a nonstandard script that reads: OP_DUP OP_HASH160 0 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG, I believe this also appears in a number of places on mainnet
I believe we also need:
Array.isArray(this.chunks[2]) && this.chunks[2].length === 20