Skip to content

Conversation

@trotterdylan
Copy link
Contributor

We were using the hardcoded branch name as the head branch in plz review
instead of the one on the PR. Most of the time that logic is correct, but if we
want to support arbitrary branch names then we need to use the one attached to
the PR.

plz-review-url: https://plz.review/review/4913

@plz-review
Copy link

plz-review bot commented Mar 28, 2022

Plz review!

@trotterdylan trotterdylan requested a review from lyndonoc March 28, 2022 12:37
Copy link
Contributor

@lyndonoc lyndonoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@trotterdylan trotterdylan changed the base branch from plz.review/review/4907 to main March 28, 2022 19:03
@trotterdylan trotterdylan force-pushed the plz.review/review/4913 branch from f5e4143 to 287473c Compare March 28, 2022 19:03
We were using the hardcoded branch name as the head branch in plz review
instead of the one on the PR. Most of the time that logic is correct, but if we
want to support arbitrary branch names then we need to use the one attached to
the PR.

plz-review-url: https://plz.review/review/4913
@plz-review plz-review bot force-pushed the plz.review/review/4913 branch from 287473c to 4dfb5e2 Compare March 28, 2022 19:03
@trotterdylan trotterdylan merged commit 8e3458c into main Mar 28, 2022
@trotterdylan trotterdylan deleted the plz.review/review/4913 branch March 28, 2022 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants