PM-36474: bug: Ensure shared totp labels do not parse secret

[david-livefront]

🎟️ Tracking

PM-36474

📔 Objective

This PR ensures that we do not parse the totp label as the secret for manually entered codes.

📸 Screenshots

Before	After

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.35%. Comparing base (3b1ea1e) to head (828dfd2).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...tor/repository/util/SharedAccountDataExtensions.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6873      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.54%   85.35%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files         843      975     +132     
  Lines       60060    62372    +2312     
  Branches     8762     8831      +69     
==========================================
+ Hits        51381    53240    +1859     
- Misses       5666     6096     +430     
- Partials     3013     3036      +23     

Flag	Coverage Δ
app-data	17.60% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
app-ui-auth-tools	20.43% <0.00%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
app-ui-platform	16.51% <0.00%> (+0.62%)	⬆️
app-ui-vault	26.25% <0.00%> (+0.61%)	⬆️
authenticator	6.60% <0.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
lib-core-network-bridge	4.07% <0.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
lib-data-ui	0.97% <0.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

🤖 Bitwarden Claude Code Review

Overall Assessment: APPROVE

Reviewed a one-line conditional fix in SharedAccountDataExtensions.toAuthenticatorItems() that prevents the manually-entered TOTP secret from being incorrectly parsed as the label when the cipher's URI has no scheme. The change is small, targeted, and consistent with the bug described in PM-36474. The before/after screenshots in the PR description demonstrate the expected user-visible fix.

Code Review Details

No actionable findings.

[david-livefront]

Thanks @SaintPatrck