PM-35200 - Create contributing guide for Claude tooling#2592
Conversation
🤖 Bitwarden Claude Code ReviewOverall Assessment: APPROVE Reviewed a documentation-only change that adds Code Review DetailsNo actionable findings. Purely additive Markdown; voice and structure align with the neighboring |
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2592 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.17% 86.08% -1.09%
==========================================
Files 1886 2116 +230
Lines 166863 181678 +14815
==========================================
+ Hits 145463 156402 +10939
- Misses 21400 25276 +3876 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
|
||
| - Run a local Bitwarden Claude Code review with `/bitwarden-code-review:code-review-local` — it | ||
| writes findings to files so you can fix them before pushing, without posting anything to GitHub. | ||
| - When you raise the PR, apply the `ai-review` label. Our reusable GitHub workflow watches for it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤔 @theMickster should it explain when to use ai-review-vnext label as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure; I'm not opposed to you altering the document in a PR 😄
In all honesty, the label is intended to be used by the people actively working on code review enhancements so we don't negatively impact the entire organization. I personally am inclined to leave this as-is for now.

🎟️ Tracking
PM-35200
📔 Objective
Craft guidance for engineers to understand contributing to Claude tooling.
The guidance in the other-side-of-the-coin for ai-plugins/pull/88.