Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7200 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.72% 61.83% +4.11%
==========================================
Files 2042 2042
Lines 89817 89838 +21
Branches 7985 7986 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 51845 55553 +3708
+ Misses 36114 32345 -3769
- Partials 1858 1940 +82 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
New Issues (2)Checkmarx found the following issues in this Pull Request
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
| CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ProviderAbilityView] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❓ Is this view necessary? We already have a view called ProviderView that contains all of the columns in the Provider table. Can you just select the columns you need from ProviderView in your stored procedure?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was done according to our contributing docs.
|
Claude finished @jrmccannon's task in 1m 48s —— View job Code Review: PR #7200 — Add Provider Ability View
Overall Assessment: APPROVE This PR adds a new Code Review DetailsNo findings. The code is consistent with existing patterns, the Dapper and EF implementations align on projected columns, and the migration is safe. |
|





🎟️ Tracking
PM-32067
📔 Objective
This adds Provider Ability View, repository methods, stored procedure and tests for the new cache to use.