Skip to content

Conversation

@wolf31o2
Copy link
Member

@wolf31o2 wolf31o2 commented Dec 5, 2025

Summary by cubic

Simplified muxer tests by replacing the custom containsString helper with strings.Contains and removing the helper function.

Written for commit dc293a7. Summary will update automatically on new commits.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved test code implementation by streamlining error assertion patterns to use standard library utilities instead of custom helpers.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@blinklabs.io>
@wolf31o2 wolf31o2 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2025 18:29
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The test file muxer/muxer_test.go is refactored to replace a custom containsString helper function with direct calls to the standard library's strings.Contains function. Three error assertion checks are updated to use this approach, and the helper function is subsequently removed from the file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify all three error-check helpers were consistently replaced with strings.Contains calls
  • Confirm the containsString helper function is fully removed and not referenced elsewhere in the test file
  • Check that the refactored assertions maintain the same error validation logic and intent

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing the containsString helper function from the test file.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/remove-helper

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f04da14 and dc293a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • muxer/muxer_test.go (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: cubic · AI code reviewer
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
muxer/muxer_test.go (1)

480-480: LGTM! Good simplification.

Replacing the custom containsString helper with the standard library's strings.Contains is more idiomatic and reduces unnecessary abstraction.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@wolf31o2 wolf31o2 requested a review from verbotenj December 5, 2025 18:30
Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

@wolf31o2 wolf31o2 merged commit 2546168 into main Dec 5, 2025
12 checks passed
@wolf31o2 wolf31o2 deleted the fix/remove-helper branch December 5, 2025 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants