Groq provider: Only 5 models shown via dropdown despite having 20 models available

[KiKaraage]

Please provide the following information
Fedora 43 x64. Desktop v1.23.0 via Flatpak.

---

To Reproduce

1. Install a fresh instance of Goose Desktop
2. Open Goose and "Welcome to Goose" screen with "Quick Setup with API Key" field will be shown
3. Insert a Groq API Key (gsk_***). Goose will show "Detected groq" with (20 models available) subcaption

4. "Choose Model" modal will show up, but **only 5 models are shown**: gpt-oss-120b, llama-3.1-8b-instant, llama-3.3-70b-versatile, llama-guard-4-12b, and gpt-oss-20b

---

Expected behavior
All 20 models should be shown, including Qwen3 and Kimi K2 Instruct

---

Additional context: The Culprit

goose/crates/goose/src/providers/declarative/groq.json

Lines 1 to 31 in 44ac5dc

	{
	"name": "groq",
	"engine": "openai",
	"display_name": "Groq (d)",
	"description": "Fast inference with Groq hardware",
	"api_key_env": "GROQ_API_KEY",
	"base_url": "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
	"models": [
	{
	"name": "openai/gpt-oss-120b",
	"context_limit": 131072
	},
	{
	"name": "llama-3.1-8b-instant",
	"context_limit": 131072
	},
	{
	"name": "llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
	"context_limit": 131072
	},
	{
	"name": "meta-llama/llama-guard-4-12b",
	"context_limit": 131072
	},
	{
	"name": "openai/gpt-oss-20b",
	"context_limit": 131072
	}
	],
	"supports_streaming": true
	}

This matches the available option on the dropdown, so editing groq.json should be sufficient to fix this bug. (I will do this and submit the PR)

Reference: bbcfe7f - Editing declarative mistral.json file to make Devstral 2 & Devstral Small 2 models available on model dropdown list

[katzdave]

Is groq (d) the intended provider or is this an xai key? If it is the case of groq (d), then yes seems like the declarative provider would be the best place.

I'm cleaning shop with this new concept of canonical models based on models.dev data and haven't looked into the declarative providers much; Ideally we'd be able to pick up even more models from there somehow.

[KiKaraage]

Is groq (d) the intended provider or is this an xai key? If it is the case of groq (d), then yes seems like the declarative provider would be the best place.

I'm cleaning shop with this new concept of canonical models based on models.dev data and haven't looked into the declarative providers much; Ideally we'd be able to pick up even more models from there somehow.

Yeah it's in the case of groq (d) as done in #5084, I just added informations to the missing models like Kimi K2 (0905) and Qwen3.

Though (pointed by @rabi too) ideally the model informations are retrieved from /v1/models or from models.dev data - I just checked and it has data for all 5 current declarated providers already.