repeat[] w/ separator

[psiha]

Could you please add this?
Otherwise we're forced into this (p for parser, s for separator)
p > 's' > p > 's' > ( p % 's' )
for a parser separated by s matched at least 3 times...

[tzlaine]

I don't think I get what you're asking for. Could you show what you'd write with the change you have in mind, and describe what the semantics would be?