I was giving dust a try and noticed that the use of the -d flag changes the displayed sizes of the directories, whereas I would have expect each directory to be the same size, but with fewer sub-levels displayed. Is this the expected behavior, a bug, or user error?
Here's the output of the dust repo after cloning it, comparing du, dust -bd1, and dust -b (using -b for more readable output below):
$ du -d 1 -h | sort -h
24K ./ci
24K ./.github
52K ./src
68K ./media
84K ./tests
552K ./.git
153M ./target
154M .
$ cargo run -- -bd1
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.02s
Running `target/debug/dust -bd1`
4.0K ┌── README.md
4.0K ├── Cargo.toml
4.0K ├── .gitignore
8.0K ├── .github
12K ├── LICENSE
16K ├── target
24K ├── ci
24K ├── Cargo.lock
32K ├── src
40K ├── .git
52K ├── tests
68K ├── media
292K ┌─┴ .
$ cargo run -- -b
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.03s
Running `target/debug/dust -b`
948K ┌── query-cache.bin
3.9M ├── dep-graph.bin
10M ┌─┴ s-fqutna58o2-1mf6920-1dfcidj0qrb4
10M ┌─┴ dust-1u7onte9p4g5s
10M ┌─┴ incremental
2.8M │ ┌── build_script_build-95c8841d5eeef07a
2.8M │ ┌─┴ log-95c8841d5eeef07a
2.8M │ │ ┌── build_script_build-98b6810859c9cb39
2.8M │ ├─┴ memchr-98b6810859c9cb39
3.1M │ │ ┌── build-script-build
3.1M │ ├─┴ bitflags-5ac1d02a416a61b2
3.2M │ │ ┌── build_script_build-9091c386f088b04c
3.2M │ ├─┴ libc-9091c386f088b04c
3.5M │ │ ┌── build-script-build
3.5M │ ├─┴ crossbeam-utils-408f2589721c053b
15M ├─┴ build
912K │ ┌── libtextwrap-1a0030a681f6ac5d.rlib
1.0M │ ├── libregex-818c9001a7df9eb5.rmeta
1.0M │ ├── libaho_corasick-39d24709df92682f.rmeta
1.1M │ ├── libstrsim-c37e1feb7d72bc60.rlib
1.3M │ ├── libnum_cpus-7c7ca82d2b6385a6.rlib
1.4M │ ├── liblscolors-d48fed5629317cfd.rlib
1.5M │ ├── libbstr-8fff9e7d83cfd68c.rlib
1.6M │ ├── libwalkdir-d08a403e2772aeb4.rlib
1.6M │ ├── libcrossbeam_utils-4e0e4e297bcafc8b.rlib
1.6M │ ├── libautocfg-b11cbca6ecbb3954.rlib
1.7M │ ├── liblibc-c64d0ff9390f98b5.rmeta
1.7M │ ├── libclap-aeb92d621b503b05.rmeta
1.8M │ ├── libcrossbeam_channel-7116bcca9ad76a0b.rlib
2.0M │ ├── liblibc-c64d0ff9390f98b5.rlib
4.9M │ ├── libaho_corasick-39d24709df92682f.rlib
5.2M │ ├── libregex_syntax-d37ef5e024ea9658.rmeta
6.0M │ ├── libglobset-3998d750ef9972f8.rlib
8.8M │ ├── libignore-92c56c21ac8db7b8.rlib
10M │ ├── libregex-818c9001a7df9eb5.rlib
13M │ ├── libregex_syntax-d37ef5e024ea9658.rlib
16M │ ├── libclap-aeb92d621b503b05.rlib
31M │ ├── dust-321965f5bb0f1679
125M ├─┴ deps
152M ┌─┴ debug
152M ┌─┴ target
153M ┌─┴ .
I was giving dust a try and noticed that the use of the
-dflag changes the displayed sizes of the directories, whereas I would have expect each directory to be the same size, but with fewer sub-levels displayed. Is this the expected behavior, a bug, or user error?Here's the output of the dust repo after cloning it, comparing
du,dust -bd1, anddust -b(using -b for more readable output below):