Suggestion: stick to semantic versioning

[jc21]

Looking through your release history, your versioning scheme is all over the place.

I'm packaging your software on my Centos and Debian repositories and it's easier for me if the version is of a consistent standard, v0.0.0. In these package managers, v4 is newer than your latest release of v0.4.5.0. I would argue that you don't need 4 levels of version numbers either.

Just a suggestion to make things easier for the consumers of your software :)

[bootandy]

Hi,

v4 was an accident its version is v0.4.0 and it was marked as a pre-release because of this.

Mostly these things occur as an accident and I can't see how to delete them from github.

Should I drop the 'v' from the versioning? Is that annoying?

[jc21]

With or without the v is fine and doesn’t matter. It was just a matter of semantic versioning.