-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
Follow up PR to #2004 #2026
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+169
−95
Merged
Follow up PR to #2004 #2026
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -50,17 +50,20 @@ pub(crate) fn test_bootc_container_inspect() -> Result<()> { | |
| .expect("kernel.unified should be present") | ||
| .as_bool() | ||
| .expect("kernel.unified should be a boolean"); | ||
|
|
||
| let is_uki = std::env::var("BOOTC_boot_type").is_ok_and(|var| var == "uki"); | ||
|
|
||
| if let Some(variant) = std::env::var("BOOTC_variant").ok() { | ||
| match variant.as_str() { | ||
| v @ "ostree" | v @ "composefs" => { | ||
| match (variant.as_str(), is_uki) { | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nonblocking but for followup: we could also validate the sealed/unsealed state here right?
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, we can |
||
| (v @ "ostree", _) | (v @ "composefs", false) => { | ||
| assert!(!unified, "Expected unified=false for variant {v}"); | ||
| // For traditional kernels, version should look like a uname (contains digits) | ||
| assert!( | ||
| version.chars().any(|c| c.is_ascii_digit()), | ||
| "version should contain version numbers for traditional kernel: {version}" | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| "composefs-sealeduki-sdboot" => { | ||
| ("composefs", true) => { | ||
| assert!(unified, "Expected unified=true for UKI variant"); | ||
| // For UKI, version is the filename without .efi extension (should not end with .efi) | ||
| assert!( | ||
|
|
@@ -70,7 +73,7 @@ pub(crate) fn test_bootc_container_inspect() -> Result<()> { | |
| // Version should be non-empty after stripping extension | ||
| assert!(!version.is_empty(), "version should not be empty for UKI"); | ||
| } | ||
| o => eprintln!("notice: Unhandled variant for kernel check: {o}"), | ||
| o => eprintln!("notice: Unhandled variant for kernel check: {o:?}"), | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -155,17 +158,19 @@ fn test_system_reinstall_help() -> Result<()> { | |
| /// Verify that the values of `variant` and `base` from Justfile actually applied | ||
| /// to this container image. | ||
| fn test_variant_base_crosscheck() -> Result<()> { | ||
| let is_uki = std::env::var("BOOTC_boot_type").is_ok_and(|var| var == "uki"); | ||
|
|
||
| if let Some(variant) = std::env::var("BOOTC_variant").ok() { | ||
| // TODO add this to `bootc status` or so? | ||
| let boot_efi = Utf8Path::new("/boot/EFI"); | ||
| match variant.as_str() { | ||
| "composefs" | "ostree" => { | ||
| match (variant.as_str(), is_uki) { | ||
| ("composefs", false) | ("ostree", _) => { | ||
| assert!(!boot_efi.try_exists()?); | ||
| } | ||
| "composefs-sealeduki-sdboot" => { | ||
| ("composefs", true) => { | ||
| assert!(boot_efi.try_exists()?); | ||
| } | ||
| o => panic!("Unhandled variant: {o}"), | ||
| o => panic!("Unhandled variant: {o:?}"), | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if let Some(base) = std::env::var("BOOTC_base").ok() { | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as an aside we should probably have btrfs in this list too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, but that will add a bunch more combinations to the matrix