docs/design: rename admin purge queue proposal → implemented (Phase 6)

[bootjp]

Summary

Phase 6 of the SQS admin purge queue rollout — all milestones in docs/design/2026_05_16_*_admin_purge_queue.md have landed on main, so rename the file per CLAUDE.md's lifecycle rule (*_proposed_*.md → *_implemented_*.md).

Phase	PR	Landed
1 (proposal)	#757	2026-05-16
2 (AdminPurgeQueue + IsDLQ)	#771	2026-05-17
3 (AdminPeekQueue backend)	#794	2026-05-20
4 (HTTP handler + bridge)	#797	2026-05-21
5 (SPA Messages tab + Purge button + DLQ chips)	#798	2026-05-21

This PR:

• git mv the design doc filename (history preserved at 98% similarity).
• Bump **Status:** from Proposed to Implemented.
• Add an Implementation history table so a future reader can trace each phase back to its PR.
• List out-of-scope follow-ups (throttle integration, audit + Prometheus counters, principalForReadSensitive live re-check, page-size selector) that remain tracked separately — none gate this rename.

Risk

None. Doc-only.

Test plan

• git mv preserves history (98% similarity reported by git)
• No other file references the old path (grep -rn "2026_05_16_proposed_admin_purge_queue" returns no hits)
• CI on this PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated design documentation to reflect the completed implementation of the admin queue purge feature, including implementation timeline and planned follow-up improvements.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fae8b058-e44e-47c2-9970-003d8f9f529a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6757f6a and f4034d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/design/2026_05_16_implemented_admin_purge_queue.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Design document for the admin peek + purge queue feature transitions from Proposed to Implemented status. Implementation history with phased PR/landing timeline is added, and out-of-scope follow-ups are expanded to track throttle, audit/metrics, role-store re-check, and page-size selector items.

Changes

Admin Purge Queue Design Status Update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Design document status and implementation history docs/design/2026_05_16_implemented_admin_purge_queue.md	Status metadata updated from Proposed to Implemented; Implementation history section added with phased PR/landing timeline; out-of-scope follow-ups list extended with throttle, audit/metrics, role-store re-check, and page-size selector tracking.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• bootjp/elastickv#757: Initial proposal PR for the admin peek + purge queue design; this PR documents the implementation status and phased timeline of the same feature.

Poem

A queue once dreamed, now born and real—
From Proposed to Implemented, sealed.
With history tracked and follow-ups clear,
The admin's purge flows crystal here. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: updating the admin purge queue design doc status from Proposed to Implemented and renaming it to reflect Phase 6 completion.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/sqs-admin-purge-queue-implemented

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[bootjp]

@claude review

[claude]

Claude finished @bootjp's task in 1m 22s —— View job

---

Code Review — PR #800: docs/design: rename admin purge queue proposal → implemented (Phase 6)

• Gather context
• Read changed file and diff
• Verify no stale references remain
• Review content and process compliance
• Post findings

---

LGTM overall — doc-only, no code risk. A few observations below.

---

Process: _proposed_ → _partial_ → _implemented_ intermediate step was skipped

CLAUDE.md states:

Lifecycle transitions: rename *_proposed_*.md → *_partial_*.md once the first milestone ships (and update the doc to record what landed and what is still open); rename *_partial_*.md → *_implemented_*.md once the final milestone ships.

The file went directly from _proposed_ to _implemented_ without an intermediate _partial_ rename. The _partial_ transition should have happened when Phase 2 (#771) shipped on 2026-05-17. Since all five implementation phases are now confirmed complete, the _implemented_ end-state is correct — but the _partial_ step was a missed obligation during Phase 2–5 reviews.

Not blocking this rename (the final state is right), but worth noting so the pattern is followed on future multi-phase proposals.

---

Minor: Status header format deviates from the README template

docs/design/README.md specifies the header template as:

Status: <Proposed | Partial | Implemented>

The doc uses bold markdown:

**Status:** Implemented

This is pre-existing (present since the original proposal) and not introduced by this PR, so it doesn't block merge — but a follow-up could normalize it to match the convention.

---

Content accuracy ✅

The implementation history table in the doc matches the PR description exactly (phases 1–5, correct PR numbers and dates). The out-of-scope follow-ups (throttle integration, audit/Prometheus counters, principalForReadSensitive re-check, page-size selector) are clearly scoped as non-blocking.

Stale reference check ✅

grep -rn "2026_05_16_proposed_admin_purge_queue" returns no hits — the old filename is fully removed with no dangling references.

docs/design/README.md index ✅

The README describes the naming convention but doesn't enumerate individual files — no index entry needs updating.

---

Summary: The rename is correct, history is preserved at 98% similarity, all five phases are confirmed shipped, and the follow-ups are clearly documented. The _partial_ skip and the **Status:** style deviation are minor process notes, not blockers.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the design document for the Admin Queue Peek and Purge feature to mark it as 'Implemented' and adds an implementation history table along with a list of out-of-scope follow-up items. Feedback was provided to ensure the document body is updated to reflect these deferrals consistently and to include mitigation strategies for operational risks, such as throttle integration, in accordance with repository guidelines.

[gemini-code-assist]

The 'Out-of-scope follow-ups' list identifies several features as deferred (Throttle integration, Audit/Prometheus, live RoleStore re-check, and Page-size selector). However, the body of this document (e.g., §3.1, §3.6, Goal 8 in §2.1, and §3.5) still describes these features as if they were implemented. Since this document is being marked as 'Implemented' and features like 'Throttle integration' are significant for managing operational risk, please update the document to reflect these deferrals and detail any mitigation strategies used in their absence to align with repository guidelines.

References

1. When a design document identifies a significant operational risk, such as the inability to perform rolling upgrades, it must also detail potential mitigation strategies, like implementing a temporary "bridge" or "proxy" mode.