chore(mergify): remove semantic version check from merge condition

[greg-in-a-box]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated repository automation rules, removing a lint status check from some automatic-merge conditions. This change affects how pull requests qualify for auto-merge and does not alter application behavior.
  • No changes to features, UI, or APIs; end-user experience remains the same.
  • CI indicators may show fewer required checks on certain pull requests.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Listen up, fool! This PR edits .mergify.yml to remove two lint_pull_request status-success requirements from the boxmoji and strict merge rules’ merge_conditions. No other rules or methods changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Mergify config ./.mergify.yml	Removed status-success = lint_pull_request from merge_conditions for the “boxmoji” and “strict” automatic merge rules; no other condition or method changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• chore(mergify): Updated mergify config with max-parallel #4188 — Touches same .mergify.yml rules; earlier added the lint check now being removed.
• chore(mergify): Updated config to exclude semver check #4179 — Also removes the lint_pull_request requirement from the same merge rules.
• chore(mergify): clean up mergify rules #4154 — Adjusted/introduced the lint status in Mergify; directly connected to this removal.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

• tjuanitas
• jpan-box

Poem

Merge gates trimmed, clean and tight—oh yeah!
Lint check gone from the queue’s green light, fool.
Mergify hums, conditions right, just so.
I pity the fool who blocks this flow!
Ship it slick, click by click—let’s go! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request title claims to remove a semantic version check, but the actual diff removes lint_pull_request requirements from the Mergify configuration, so the title misrepresents the primary change and could confuse reviewers, fool. I pity the fool who mixes up version checks with lint gating.	Please update the title to accurately reflect that the change removes the lint_pull_request merge condition so it matches the actual modifications and avoids misleading the team, fool.
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is still the unmodified template instructions and contains no information about what this PR actually does, so it fails to meet the repository’s description requirements, fool. I pity the fool who leaves the template in place without adding a summary of the change.	Please replace the placeholder comments with a filled‐out description that summarizes the removal of lint_pull_request checks from the Mergify rules and explains the motive behind the change so the PR aligns with the repository’s template, fool.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b915e45 and 8d156c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .mergify.yml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .mergify.yml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: lint_test_build
• GitHub Check: Summary

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}