Gap
The openai/gpt-oss-120b entry in packages/proxy/schema/model_list.json has stale pricing. The catalog lists $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens (input/output), but both Groq and Together AI now charge $0.15/$0.60.
Catalog vs Official
| Field |
Catalog Value |
Groq Official |
Together Official |
input_cost_per_mil_tokens |
0.10 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
output_cost_per_mil_tokens |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Affected Entry
- Model ID:
openai/gpt-oss-120b
- File:
packages/proxy/schema/model_list.json (line ~1532)
- Current providers:
["groq", "together", "baseten"]
Current catalog entry:
"openai/gpt-oss-120b": {
"format": "openai",
"flavor": "chat",
"input_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.1,
"output_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.5,
"input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.075,
"displayName": "OpenAI GPT-OSS (120B)",
"reasoning": true,
"max_input_tokens": 131072,
"max_output_tokens": 32766,
"available_providers": ["groq", "together", "baseten"]
}
Verification
- Source 1: Groq models docs — production models pricing table lists
openai/gpt-oss-120b at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens
- Source 2: Together AI serverless models —
openai/gpt-oss-120b listed at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens
Both independent provider sources agree on the updated pricing, confirming the catalog value is stale.
Fields NOT changed
input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens (0.075) — not verified from current sources; may also need updating but not confirmed
max_output_tokens (32766) — Groq lists 65,536 max output for this model. The catalog value of 32,766 may also be stale, but the Together docs did not publish max output, so this is noted but not filed as a confirmed gap
- Baseten pricing — not checked; the Baseten provider may have different pricing
Local files inspected
packages/proxy/schema/model_list.json — confirmed current entry at line ~1532
Source URLs
{
"kind": "cost_update",
"provider": "groq",
"models": ["openai/gpt-oss-120b"],
"status": "active",
"model_specs": {
"openai/gpt-oss-120b": {
"format": "openai",
"flavor": "chat",
"input_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.15,
"output_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.6,
"displayName": "OpenAI GPT-OSS (120B)",
"reasoning": true,
"max_input_tokens": 131072,
"max_output_tokens": 32766,
"available_providers": ["groq", "together", "baseten"]
}
},
"source_urls": [
"https://console.groq.com/docs/models",
"https://docs.together.ai/docs/serverless-models"
]
}
Gap
The
openai/gpt-oss-120bentry inpackages/proxy/schema/model_list.jsonhas stale pricing. The catalog lists $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens (input/output), but both Groq and Together AI now charge $0.15/$0.60.Catalog vs Official
input_cost_per_mil_tokensoutput_cost_per_mil_tokensAffected Entry
openai/gpt-oss-120bpackages/proxy/schema/model_list.json(line ~1532)["groq", "together", "baseten"]Current catalog entry:
Verification
openai/gpt-oss-120bat $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokensopenai/gpt-oss-120blisted at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokensBoth independent provider sources agree on the updated pricing, confirming the catalog value is stale.
Fields NOT changed
input_cache_read_cost_per_mil_tokens(0.075) — not verified from current sources; may also need updating but not confirmedmax_output_tokens(32766) — Groq lists 65,536 max output for this model. The catalog value of 32,766 may also be stale, but the Together docs did not publish max output, so this is noted but not filed as a confirmed gapLocal files inspected
packages/proxy/schema/model_list.json— confirmed current entry at line ~1532Source URLs
{ "kind": "cost_update", "provider": "groq", "models": ["openai/gpt-oss-120b"], "status": "active", "model_specs": { "openai/gpt-oss-120b": { "format": "openai", "flavor": "chat", "input_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.15, "output_cost_per_mil_tokens": 0.6, "displayName": "OpenAI GPT-OSS (120B)", "reasoning": true, "max_input_tokens": 131072, "max_output_tokens": 32766, "available_providers": ["groq", "together", "baseten"] } }, "source_urls": [ "https://console.groq.com/docs/models", "https://docs.together.ai/docs/serverless-models" ] }