Skip to content

fix: flush pass in evaluator state if it exists#1581

Merged
Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged 3 commits intomainfrom
flush-evaluator-state
Mar 17, 2026
Merged

fix: flush pass in evaluator state if it exists#1581
Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged 3 commits intomainfrom
flush-evaluator-state

Conversation

@j13huang
Copy link
Contributor

@j13huang john (j13huang) commented Mar 17, 2026

Not sure if code change this is correct, but in the playground code flow we pass in a parent and state in the param. I'm assuming that if we call flush with a custom parent we would want to flush to a state from the params if it was provided. Please advise, thanks

@AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

yeah this looks fine to me! Let me add a test and we can merge it in. Gonna rebase the PR to include the latest changes from main.

@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) changed the title flush pass in evaluator state if it exists fix: flush pass in evaluator state if it exists Mar 17, 2026
@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged commit 52e1b94 into main Mar 17, 2026
48 checks passed
@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) deleted the flush-evaluator-state branch March 17, 2026 23:59
@AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants