Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new tutorial markdown file was added documenting how to set up Mise as a version manager for iOS/Swift development, covering installation, configuration with Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@Content/tutorials/mise-setup-guide.md`:
- Line 3: The frontmatter contains a future publish date "date: 2026-05-01"
which will schedule the tutorial; confirm whether you intend to schedule it—if
not, set the date to the intended publish date (e.g., today's date) or remove
the date field entirely; locate and update the "date:" frontmatter entry that
currently equals "2026-05-01".
- Around line 12-33: Fix several grammar and typo issues in the user-facing
copy: change "Each have" to "Each has", "there are a lot out there" to "there
are many out there", "Mise fit" to "Mise fits", split or rephrase "I've gone
with Mise, it seems to be best suited..." into two clear sentences (e.g., "I've
gone with Mise. It seems best suited..."), change "as a develop" to "as a
developer", and hyphenate "Swift Package based" to "Swift Package–based" (or
"Swift Package based tools" -> "Swift Package–based tools"). Update these exact
phrases in the paragraphs under the intro and the "What is Mise?" and "Mint"
sections to improve clarity and polish.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9dbea7be-c139-4cd5-b26e-f1522f1613ef
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Content/tutorials/mise-setup-guide.mdResources/media/tutorials/mise-setup-guide/mise-setup-guide-hero.webp
| @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: Getting Started with Mise for iOS and Swift Development | |||
| date: 2026-05-01 00:00 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Confirm publish date intent (2026-05-01) before merge.
This is a future date relative to today (April 17, 2026). If this isn’t meant to be scheduled, it may keep the tutorial hidden depending on site build rules.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@Content/tutorials/mise-setup-guide.md` at line 3, The frontmatter contains a
future publish date "date: 2026-05-01" which will schedule the tutorial; confirm
whether you intend to schedule it—if not, set the date to the intended publish
date (e.g., today's date) or remove the date field entirely; locate and update
the "date:" frontmatter entry that currently equals "2026-05-01".
Comment on lines
+12
to
+33
| Over the years, I've used a variety of tools from Homebrew to Mint. Each have had their share of issues and perks. Over the past year I've gone with Mise, it seems to be best suited for what I'm looking for. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## What is Mise? | ||
|
|
||
| Mise is a tool version manager. There are a lot out there but Mise fit what I was looking for. Here's what I have tried and didn't quite fit: | ||
|
|
||
| ### HomeBrew | ||
|
|
||
| HomeBrew is great for installing tools and apps locally on my computer. I recently purchased a brand new 15-inch M5 MacBook Air and rather than restoring from a backup I used Brew Bundle to restore the list of apps from my old MacBook Air easily. However for development tools, it's not really ideal especially in the case of Continuous Integration (automated build servers like GitHub Actions). **I want an isolated environment when I use CI** in order to have a repeatable environment regardless of OS or where the machine is hosted. So that fell short. Lastly handling multiple versions of language tools (ruby, node, etc...) is not ideal and is better suited with specific tools (rbenv, nvm, etc...). | ||
|
|
||
| ### Swift Package Plugin | ||
|
|
||
| There are several reasons I don't use Swift Package plugins but the biggest is the lack of support distinguishing between a consumer of a swift package vs a developer of a Swift package. I really don't want a consumer to need to pull Swift tools I use (swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, stringslint, etc...) as a develop when trying to consume my library. There are proposals and [tools](https://github.com/shibapm/Rocket) that try to remediate this but it really hasn't stuck. Therefore it's best to configure these outside of Package.swift. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Mint | ||
|
|
||
| Mint is a fantastic tool for installing Swift Package based tools. As a Swift developer, I frequently use tools like swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, and stringslint. To be able to install these tools on my machine is great. However there were a few shortcomings: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. It's not really meant for continuous integration so you don't get the isolated environment which CI requires. | ||
| 2. Only suited for Swift Packages. If you have a web application attached (node) or require fastlane for deployment (ruby), you'll need an additional tool to do this. | ||
| 3. Every swift package is rebuilt; so deployment via binaries is unavailable meaning long build times just to get the tool up and running. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tighten grammar/typos in user-facing copy.
There are a few visible issues (e.g., “Each have…”, “Mise fit…”, “as a develop…”, “Swift Package based”). Worth fixing before publishing for polish and credibility.
✍️ Suggested edits
-Over the years, I've used a variety of tools from Homebrew to Mint. Each have had their share of issues and perks. Over the past year I've gone with Mise, it seems to be best suited for what I'm looking for.
+Over the years, I've used a variety of tools, from Homebrew to Mint. Each has had its share of issues and perks. Over the past year, I've gone with Mise, and it seems best suited to what I'm looking for.
-Mise is a tool version manager. There are a lot out there but Mise fit what I was looking for. Here's what I have tried and didn't quite fit:
+Mise is a tool version manager. There are many options, but Mise fits what I was looking for. Here's what I tried that didn’t quite fit:
-There are several reasons I don't use Swift Package plugins but the biggest is the lack of support distinguishing between a consumer of a swift package vs a developer of a Swift package. I really don't want a consumer to need to pull Swift tools I use (swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, stringslint, etc...) as a develop when trying to consume my library.
+There are several reasons I don't use Swift Package plugins, but the biggest is the lack of support for distinguishing between a consumer of a Swift package vs. a developer of a Swift package. I don’t want a consumer to need to pull Swift tools I use (swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, stringslint, etc.) as a developer when trying to consume my library.
-Mint is a fantastic tool for installing Swift Package based tools.
+Mint is a fantastic tool for installing Swift Package-based tools.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| Over the years, I've used a variety of tools from Homebrew to Mint. Each have had their share of issues and perks. Over the past year I've gone with Mise, it seems to be best suited for what I'm looking for. | |
| ## What is Mise? | |
| Mise is a tool version manager. There are a lot out there but Mise fit what I was looking for. Here's what I have tried and didn't quite fit: | |
| ### HomeBrew | |
| HomeBrew is great for installing tools and apps locally on my computer. I recently purchased a brand new 15-inch M5 MacBook Air and rather than restoring from a backup I used Brew Bundle to restore the list of apps from my old MacBook Air easily. However for development tools, it's not really ideal especially in the case of Continuous Integration (automated build servers like GitHub Actions). **I want an isolated environment when I use CI** in order to have a repeatable environment regardless of OS or where the machine is hosted. So that fell short. Lastly handling multiple versions of language tools (ruby, node, etc...) is not ideal and is better suited with specific tools (rbenv, nvm, etc...). | |
| ### Swift Package Plugin | |
| There are several reasons I don't use Swift Package plugins but the biggest is the lack of support distinguishing between a consumer of a swift package vs a developer of a Swift package. I really don't want a consumer to need to pull Swift tools I use (swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, stringslint, etc...) as a develop when trying to consume my library. There are proposals and [tools](https://github.com/shibapm/Rocket) that try to remediate this but it really hasn't stuck. Therefore it's best to configure these outside of Package.swift. | |
| ### Mint | |
| Mint is a fantastic tool for installing Swift Package based tools. As a Swift developer, I frequently use tools like swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, and stringslint. To be able to install these tools on my machine is great. However there were a few shortcomings: | |
| 1. It's not really meant for continuous integration so you don't get the isolated environment which CI requires. | |
| 2. Only suited for Swift Packages. If you have a web application attached (node) or require fastlane for deployment (ruby), you'll need an additional tool to do this. | |
| 3. Every swift package is rebuilt; so deployment via binaries is unavailable meaning long build times just to get the tool up and running. | |
| Over the years, I've used a variety of tools, from Homebrew to Mint. Each has had its share of issues and perks. Over the past year, I've gone with Mise, and it seems best suited to what I'm looking for. | |
| ## What is Mise? | |
| Mise is a tool version manager. There are many options, but Mise fits what I was looking for. Here's what I tried that didn't quite fit: | |
| ### HomeBrew | |
| HomeBrew is great for installing tools and apps locally on my computer. I recently purchased a brand new 15-inch M5 MacBook Air and rather than restoring from a backup I used Brew Bundle to restore the list of apps from my old MacBook Air easily. However for development tools, it's not really ideal especially in the case of Continuous Integration (automated build servers like GitHub Actions). **I want an isolated environment when I use CI** in order to have a repeatable environment regardless of OS or where the machine is hosted. So that fell short. Lastly handling multiple versions of language tools (ruby, node, etc...) is not ideal and is better suited with specific tools (rbenv, nvm, etc...). | |
| ### Swift Package Plugin | |
| There are several reasons I don't use Swift Package plugins, but the biggest is the lack of support for distinguishing between a consumer of a Swift package vs. a developer of a Swift package. I don't want a consumer to need to pull Swift tools I use (swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, stringslint, etc.) as a developer when trying to consume my library. There are proposals and [tools](https://github.com/shibapm/Rocket) that try to remediate this but it really hasn't stuck. Therefore it's best to configure these outside of Package.swift. | |
| ### Mint | |
| Mint is a fantastic tool for installing Swift Package-based tools. As a Swift developer, I frequently use tools like swift-format, swiftlint, xcodegen, periphery, and stringslint. To be able to install these tools on my machine is great. However there were a few shortcomings: | |
| 1. It's not really meant for continuous integration so you don't get the isolated environment which CI requires. | |
| 2. Only suited for Swift Packages. If you have a web application attached (node) or require fastlane for deployment (ruby), you'll need an additional tool to do this. | |
| 3. Every swift package is rebuilt; so deployment via binaries is unavailable meaning long build times just to get the tool up and running. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~12-~12: Consider using a more concise synonym.
Context: ...ls drop. --- Over the years, I've used a variety of tools from Homebrew to Mint. Each have ...
(A_VARIETY_OF)
[grammar] ~21-~21: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...y computer. I recently purchased a brand new 15-inch M5 MacBook Air and rather th...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[style] ~21-~21: Consider a more concise word here.
Context: ...an isolated environment when I use CI** in order to have a repeatable environment regardles...
(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
[grammar] ~29-~29: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...tastic tool for installing Swift Package based tools. As a Swift developer, I fre...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@Content/tutorials/mise-setup-guide.md` around lines 12 - 33, Fix several
grammar and typo issues in the user-facing copy: change "Each have" to "Each
has", "there are a lot out there" to "there are many out there", "Mise fit" to
"Mise fits", split or rephrase "I've gone with Mise, it seems to be best
suited..." into two clear sentences (e.g., "I've gone with Mise. It seems best
suited..."), change "as a develop" to "as a developer", and hyphenate "Swift
Package based" to "Swift Package–based" (or "Swift Package based tools" ->
"Swift Package–based tools"). Update these exact phrases in the paragraphs under
the intro and the "What is Mise?" and "Mint" sections to improve clarity and
polish.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
.mise.tomlconfiguration with Swift package tooling, GitHub Actions integration with caching support, local verification commands, production patterns, and detailed troubleshooting for PATH issues, SPM builds, and version mismatches.