Separating browser-agent execution from completion validation #2176
Unanswered
productmakerjason
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
|
Use Stagehand's result as execution evidence, not as the completion gate. The pattern I would use is: So the boundary is: Stagehand decides and performs the browser action; your workflow advances only after a separate assertion passes. Natural-language output and traces are useful for debugging/retry decisions, but they are too soft to be the source of truth for completion. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi Stagehand community — I’m testing a browser-agent reliability boundary.
When Stagehand/AI performs an action, what should confirm completion before the workflow moves forward?
Natural-language result, action trace, UI assertion, Playwright check, target-system record, or external validator?
I’m exploring whether browser agents should execute, while a separate validator confirms task completion.
All reactions