feat: Output Run ID

[jhkersul]

Why? 🤔

Hello everyone! How are you? For my test scenario, I need to have access to the suiteRunId or testRunId to generate a link for the test executed. So I added two new possible outputs: suiteRunId and testRunId

How? 🧑‍💻

• Capturing the execution output on a variable and checking if has suiteRunId or testRunId
• Sending values to the $GITHUB_OUTPUT variable
• It also captures the original status that BugBug Cli resulted and exits with that status

Result 🔢

• You can access the outputs through steps.<step-name>.outputs.suiteRunId or steps.<step-name>.outputs.testRunId

[simplypixi]

Hi @jhkersul !
First of all, thank you for the PR. <3

The code seems to be fine in general :)
I left you one small comment.

[simplypixi]

@jhkersul I wonder if I might ask you another question, apart from the PR. Do you really need those outputs? You run specific suite/test using this gh-action, so you have direct access to suiteId/testId.

I think it's a good idea to return some extra data as action output, but I'm just wondering whether there's a particular reason you need those outputs.

[jhkersul]

@jhkersul I wonder if I might ask you another question, apart from the PR. Do you really need those outputs? You run specific suite/test using this gh-action, so you have direct access to suiteId/testId.

I think it's a good idea to return some extra data as action output, but I'm just wondering whether there's a particular reason you need those outputs.

I do have access to the suiteId/testId, but I don't have access to the suiteRunId and testRunId 🤔

My use case: I run my E2E Tests during PR phase, and after the tests run, I comment on the PR with the result of the test, with a link to the report (this link needs the Run ID)

Example:

The link is like:
https://app.bugbug.io/organizations/<ORG_ID>/projects/<PROJECT_ID>/runs-history/suites/${suiteRunId}/

[simplypixi]

@jhkersul I wonder if I might ask you another question, apart from the PR. Do you really need those outputs? You run specific suite/test using this gh-action, so you have direct access to suiteId/testId.
I think it's a good idea to return some extra data as action output, but I'm just wondering whether there's a particular reason you need those outputs.

I do have access to the suiteId/testId, but I don't have access to the suiteRunId and testRunId 🤔

Oh, that's right. Sorry for the misunderstanding. 😅

My use case: I run my E2E Tests during PR phase, and after the tests run, I comment on the PR with the result of the test, with a link to the report (this link needs the Run ID)

Sounds like a great idea for a new optional feature to implement directly in the action 👍