Fuzzing function generator: bound the debug-labels size.#73
Merged
cfallin merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom Aug 31, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Currently there is a loop that takes a variable step toward an end point with an integer from `Arbitrary`; if this integer is always zero (for example due to end-of-input?) then we add debug labels to a particular input SSA value forever. This eventually causes an OOM crash. This PR bounds the loop at a reasonable count (10) instead.
fitzgen
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently there is a loop that takes a variable step toward an end point
with an integer from
Arbitrary; if this integer is always zero (forexample due to end-of-input?) then we add debug labels to a particular
input SSA value forever. This eventually causes an OOM crash. This PR
bounds the loop at a reasonable count (10) instead.