Skip to content

Gate some async features behind separate feature gates#2095

Merged
alexcrichton merged 2 commits intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton:more-async-features
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Gate some async features behind separate feature gates#2095
alexcrichton merged 2 commits intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton:more-async-features

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is an implementation of WebAssembly/component-model#468 in this repository. This also takes a moment to rename some component-model-* feature names to cm-* to avoid being so wordy. Additionally this renumbers some features to compress the bit space being used.

This is an implementation of WebAssembly/component-model#468 in this
repository. This also takes a moment to rename some `component-model-*`
feature names to `cm-*` to avoid being so wordy. Additionally this
renumbers some features to compress the bit space being used.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested a review from dicej March 11, 2025 20:29
Comment thread crates/wasmparser/src/validator/component.rs Outdated
@alexcrichton alexcrichton enabled auto-merge March 11, 2025 21:55
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 7be33ae Mar 11, 2025
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the more-async-features branch March 11, 2025 22:07
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/wasm-tools that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
I meant to hold off merging bytecodealliance#2095 until WebAssembly/component-model#468
was finished but I forgot and merged it anyway. This commit updates the
implementation in wasmparser's validation with the result of some
discussion on that upstream PR.
github-merge-queue Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
I meant to hold off merging #2095 until WebAssembly/component-model#468
was finished but I forgot and merged it anyway. This commit updates the
implementation in wasmparser's validation with the result of some
discussion on that upstream PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants