Skip to content

Comments

Cranelift: fuzzgen: avoid generating preserve_all-ABI functions with return values.#12489

Merged
cfallin merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
cfallin:fuzzgen-preserve-all-no-returns
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

Cranelift: fuzzgen: avoid generating preserve_all-ABI functions with return values.#12489
cfallin merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
cfallin:fuzzgen-preserve-all-no-returns

Conversation

@cfallin
Copy link
Member

@cfallin cfallin commented Feb 2, 2026

Fixes #12488.

@cfallin cfallin requested a review from a team as a code owner February 2, 2026 16:08
@cfallin cfallin requested review from fitzgen and removed request for a team February 2, 2026 16:08
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2026
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 2, 2026
@cfallin cfallin added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 2, 2026
@cfallin
Copy link
Member Author

cfallin commented Feb 2, 2026

Stating it for the record, this is bouncing off of the merge queue (e.g., one failure) with jobs preemptively canceled without starting with the error "The job was not acquired by Runner of type hosted even after multiple attempts". This appears to be due to this incident with GitHub Runners, which is the second showstopper CI incident in the past week with GHA.

@cfallin cfallin added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 2, 2026
@cfallin cfallin added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2026
@cfallin
Copy link
Member Author

cfallin commented Feb 2, 2026

Most jobs are going now but the s390x ones are stuck -- realizing this should go behind #12491 which is still open (I'll re-queue that one and have it jump this in queue).

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator label Feb 3, 2026
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 9e62671 Feb 3, 2026
45 checks passed
@cfallin cfallin deleted the fuzzgen-preserve-all-no-returns branch February 3, 2026 01:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cranelift-fuzzgen using preserve_all is generating return values

2 participants