refactor: remove obsolete //+build comments#2450
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: stringsbuilder <stringsbuilder@outlook.com>
dboyliao
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2026
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2450 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 19.81% 19.98% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 1090 1103 +13
Lines 73700 74605 +905
==========================================
+ Hits 14604 14910 +306
- Misses 57764 58336 +572
- Partials 1332 1359 +27
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Collaborator
|
Nice work! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The plusbuild analyzer suggests a fix to remove obsolete build tags of the form:
in files that also contain a Go 1.18-style tag such as:
(It does not check that the old and new tags are consistent;
that is the job of the 'buildtag' analyzer in the vet suite.)