Skip to content

Bump docker to v27.2.0#19

Merged
yaroslavcev merged 1 commit intocabify:masterfrom
aabian:aabian/bump-docker
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Bump docker to v27.2.0#19
yaroslavcev merged 1 commit intocabify:masterfrom
aabian:aabian/bump-docker

Conversation

@aabian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aabian aabian commented Sep 2, 2024

Bump docker dependency to 27.2.0

@aabian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aabian commented Sep 2, 2024

In case you are reviewing with an older version of docker engine installed locally, you could try:

DOCKER_API_VERSION=1.46 make acceptance

Comment thread acceptance/go.mod
go 1.22

require (
github.com/cabify/aceptadora v0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this pseudo version was intentionally set to highlight that we use current version with replace statement later.

replace github.com/cabify/aceptadora => ../

Having particular tag might confuse reader, making him thinking that we run acceptance on an older version

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the comment, I've added your suggestion

@yaroslavcev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In case you are reviewing with an older version of docker engine installed locally, you could try:

DOCKER_API_VERSION=1.46 make acceptance

Acceptance failed with

Error response from daemon: client version 1.47 is too new. Maximum supported API version is 1.45

Could you try adding DOCKER_API_VERSION=1.45 to https://github.com/cabify/aceptadora/blob/003770ba73ab5c4513bf24fe0808717a7661d901/acceptance/config/default.env

@aabian aabian force-pushed the aabian/bump-docker branch from 7b377f1 to a52b37c Compare September 4, 2024 07:47
@yaroslavcev yaroslavcev merged commit 4dd198c into cabify:master Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants