Skip to content

docs: update SDK feature matrix — TypeScript SDK now production#3

Merged
27Bslash6 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ts-sdk-feature-matrix-update
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

docs: update SDK feature matrix — TypeScript SDK now production#3
27Bslash6 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ts-sdk-feature-matrix-update

Conversation

@27Bslash6
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Updates TypeScript SDK status from 🔜 Development to ✅ Production across all tables
  • Removes L1 from Cache Backends table (it's a cache layer, not a backend — covered in Reliability)
  • Expands Architecture Notes with full TS SDK capabilities
  • Corrects 16+ stale cells that showed ❌ for features already implemented

Key changes

Section Before After
SDK Overview 🔜 Development ✅ Production (v0.1.0)
ByteStorage 🔜 Planned ✅ via NAPI (Rust)
Encryption (5 features) 🔜/❌ ✅ via NAPI
Reliability (5 features)
Protocol Compliance (6 rows) ⚠️/❌ ✅ Compliant

Companion PR: cachekit-io/cachekit-ts#27 (wires ByteStorage into cache pipeline)

Test plan

  • Cross-referenced every ✅ claim against actual codebase (442 passing tests in cachekit-ts)
  • Verified via testing-skeptic-validator agent and pr-reviewer agent

…tocol-compliant

The feature matrix was significantly stale for cachekit-ts. Updates:

- SDK status: Development → Production (v0.1.0, @cachekit-io/cachekit)
- Core: Blake2b ✅, ByteStorage ✅ (via NAPI)
- Encryption: AES-256-GCM, HKDF, AAD v0x03, counter nonces all ✅
- Backends: removed L1 from backends table (it's a cache layer, not a backend)
- Reliability: circuit breaker, L1/L2 dual-layer, stampede prevention, locking all ✅
- Protocol compliance: all requirements now ✅ including test vectors
- Architecture notes expanded with full TS SDK capabilities
@27Bslash6
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@27Bslash6 27Bslash6 merged commit f4a78a3 into main Apr 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant