Skip to content

Conversation

@timl3136
Copy link
Member

What changed?
Implement signal_with_start_workflow client method

Why?
It's a necessary feature for signaling in python client

How did you test it?
Add an integration test to test signal_with_start.

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

timl3136 and others added 3 commits October 30, 2025 13:08
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
…n-client into signal_with_start

Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Resolved conflicts:
- Added Generic import to support Generic[C] type parameter
- Removed unused TYPE_CHECKING import and empty block
- Removed client() method from WorkflowContext (removed in upstream)
- Removed test_workflow_engine_integration.py as upstream reorganized tests
- Adopted upstream's frozen=True for WorkflowInfo
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
@timl3136 timl3136 merged commit d4146cb into cadence-workflow:main Dec 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@timl3136 timl3136 deleted the signal_with_start branch December 2, 2025 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants