README: clarify the superpowers relationship (TDD disambiguation + brainstorming); bump v3.2.5#20
Open
cahenesy wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
README: clarify the superpowers relationship (TDD disambiguation + brainstorming); bump v3.2.5#20cahenesy wants to merge 1 commit into
cahenesy wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
test-driven-development) and resolve the brainstorming ownership confusion; bump v3.2.5 - Add a callout: "TDD" = Technical Design Document in throughline vs test-driven development in superpowers; throughline owns the documents, superpowers the discipline. - Reframe ownership: throughline owns governance + the design phase (its /prd-author, /tdd-author are the governance-producing equivalents of brainstorming/writing-plans); superpowers owns the engineering mechanics + open-ended brainstorming. - Explain why throughline doesn't double-fire brainstorming (its design commands ARE the design step), without contradicting "superpowers owns discovery". - Disambiguate the same "superpowers:TDD" wording in the file tree + dependencies list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes two confusing/conflicting statements in Relationship to superpowers & the official plugins.
1. "TDD" was ambiguous. The section listed TDD under superpowers' ownership, but throughline owns creating TDDs — because the acronym means two different things:
docs/tdd/).Added a callout making this explicit (throughline owns the documents; superpowers owns the discipline), and disambiguated the same wording in the file tree and the dependencies list.
2. The brainstorming "contradiction." The section said superpowers owns
brainstorming/discovery, then said throughline won't firesuperpowers:brainstorming— which read as a conflict. Reframed:/prd-author+/tdd-authorare the governance-producing equivalents ofbrainstorming/writing-plans(they run the interview and emit a governed artifact);brainstormingonly because its design commands are the design step (double-work otherwise) — and plain brainstorming still stands when no throughline command is driving.Docs-only +
plugin.json3.2.4 → 3.2.5.🤖 Generated with Claude Code