Skip to content

Conversation

@Scotchester
Copy link
Member

ℹ️ PR is to base branch feature/dsdl ℹ️


Per feedback from @cmajel in #547

@Scotchester Scotchester requested review from a team as code owners December 11, 2025 20:55
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Deploy Preview for cal-itp-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 67f4666
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cal-itp-website/deploys/693b2fd3ac243200086b3700
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-554--cal-itp-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@Scotchester
Copy link
Member Author

@cmajel Please review THIS preview site with the change to Noto for body and let me know if anything stands out as unreleasable. Thanks!

/* Space Grotesk: Variable weight, 400–700 */
/* Source Code Pro: 400 only */
@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Space+Grotesk:wght@400..700&family=Source+Code+Pro&display=swap');
@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Noto+Sans:ital,wght@0,400..800;1,400..800&family=Source+Code+Pro&family=Space+Grotesk:wght@400..700&display=swap');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't think we're using full 800 weight anywhere for Noto Sans. also, what are the double set of semicolon delimited weight value ranges for?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The DSDL does specify 800 (extra-bold) as an available option, however, that was in the context of Space Grotesk being used for everything. None of the core styles would have Noto Sans set in extra-bold. AND Christine mentioned wanting to use 600 as the standard bold in body copy, so limiting it to that might be a foolproof way to guarantee it 🤔

h5, .h5,
h6, .h6 {
font-family: var(--dsdl-heading-font-stack);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these exact same declarations are repeated below, yes?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah, you're right. I wrote it before adding the ones below and forgot to drop it.

Copy link
Member

@jgravois jgravois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i know i'm not @cmajel but i think this iteration looks imminently shippable :shipit:👍

@cmajel
Copy link
Member

cmajel commented Dec 12, 2025

Looks good to me! Ship it 🚀

@jgravois
Copy link
Member

jgravois commented Dec 12, 2025

thx @cmajel 🙏 . since @Scotchester is out today i'm going to merge this one (and #547) to unblock #537.

if relevant, my nits can certainly be addressed in a follow-up PR.

@jgravois jgravois merged commit be97761 into feature/dsdl Dec 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@jgravois jgravois deleted the feature/dsdl-body-type branch December 12, 2025 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants