Skip to content

chore: remove duplicate translation key#28409

Merged
Ryukemeister merged 1 commit intocalcom:mainfrom
SinghaAnirban005:chore/sm
Mar 13, 2026
Merged

chore: remove duplicate translation key#28409
Ryukemeister merged 1 commit intocalcom:mainfrom
SinghaAnirban005:chore/sm

Conversation

@SinghaAnirban005
Copy link
Contributor

@SinghaAnirban005 SinghaAnirban005 commented Mar 13, 2026

What does this PR do?

This PR removes a redundant translation key value pair

Mandatory Tasks (DO NOT REMOVE)

  • I have self-reviewed the code (A decent size PR without self-review might be rejected).
  • I have updated the developer docs in /docs if this PR makes changes that would require a documentation change. N/A
  • I confirm automated tests are in place that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the community Created by Linear-GitHub Sync label Mar 13, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Copy link
Member

@sahitya-chandra sahitya-chandra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SinghaAnirban005 Its not duplicate, can you clarify?

@SinghaAnirban005
Copy link
Contributor Author

Saw the same keys at lines 1663 and 4364 inside locales/en/common.json

@Ryukemeister Ryukemeister enabled auto-merge (squash) March 13, 2026 16:01
@Ryukemeister Ryukemeister added the run-ci Approve CI to run for external contributors label Mar 13, 2026
@Ryukemeister Ryukemeister merged commit 27a7821 into calcom:main Mar 13, 2026
92 of 94 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community Created by Linear-GitHub Sync ready-for-e2e run-ci Approve CI to run for external contributors size/XS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants