updated prisma with new prisma config #64
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Harish-Naruto has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughPrisma/tooling upgraded; new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @package.json:
- Line 45: The project has a Prisma version mismatch: the "prisma" CLI
dependency was bumped to "^7.2.0" but "@prisma/client" remains at "^6.11.1";
update the "@prisma/client" dependency to match the "prisma" version (e.g., set
"@prisma/client": "^7.2.0") or align both to the same compatible release, then
reinstall dependencies and run "prisma generate" to regenerate the client so the
runtime client matches the CLI.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.jsonprisma.config.tsprisma/schema.prisma
🔇 Additional comments (3)
package.json (1)
62-62: dotenv^17.2.3is a valid, published release on npm. The version is compatible with the project's dependency set, which targets modern Node.js versions (indicated by recent versions of TypeScript, Prisma, and @types/node). No compatibility issues identified.prisma/schema.prisma (1)
5-5: No issues with the generator provider configuration.The generator provider
"prisma-client"is the correct value for Prisma v7 (it replaces the older"prisma-client-js"). The configuration also includes the requiredoutputpath on line 6, so the generator is properly set up.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
prisma.config.ts (1)
1-17: Fix import statement formatting.Line 3: Add a space after the comma in the import destructuring:
import { defineConfig, env } from "prisma/config";The
prisma.config.tswithdefineConfigfrom"prisma/config"is the correct Prisma 7 configuration pattern. However, you can simplify the environment loading by usingimport 'dotenv/config'instead of thedotenv.config()call, which aligns with Prisma 7 documentation practices.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @tests/Progress.test.ts:
- Line 7: The test imports CompletedQuestion from the enums module but
CompletedQuestion is a Prisma model type, not an enum; update the import in
Progress.test.ts to import the CompletedQuestion type from the generated Prisma
client/module that exports model types (the same place other tests get model
types), replacing the incorrect "../src/generated/prisma/enums" import with the
correct generated prisma client export for CompletedQuestion (search the
generated prisma exports if needed to find the exact module name).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
package.jsontests/Interview.test.tstests/Progress.test.tstests/Question.test.tstests/Topics.test.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/Question.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run Tests
tests/Progress.test.ts
[error] 7-7: Module '../src/generated/prisma/enums' has no exported member 'CompletedQuestion'.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/Interview.test.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Correct enum import path.The
Verdictenum is correctly imported from theenumsmodule, which aligns with the new Prisma 7.x generated code structure. The usage throughout the test file confirms this is an enum type (e.g.,Verdict.Selected).package.json (2)
59-59: PostgreSQL package versions are current and compatible.The
pg@^8.16.3and@types/pg@^8.16.0versions are up-to-date and properly aligned for compatibility with the Prisma PostgreSQL adapter. No action needed.
45-45: Prisma 7.2.0 alignment is correct and properly integrated.The version alignment across
prisma,@prisma/client, and@prisma/adapter-pg(all^7.2.0) is complete and matches the existing v7 configuration inprisma.config.ts. The datasource URL has been correctly moved to the config file per v7 requirements, and the schema is properly configured. No blocking issues with the package.json updates.tests/Topics.test.ts (1)
9-9: Fix theTopicimport path.The import path
../src/generated/prisma/browseris incorrect. Based on the pattern used in other test files (e.g.,Question.test.tsimports from../src/generated/prisma/client), model types should import from the/clientsubmodule:import { Topic } from "../src/generated/prisma/client";Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @src/db/client.ts:
- Around line 5-7: The code instantiates PrismaPg with process.env.DATABASE_URL
without validating it, so add a guard to check that DATABASE_URL is present and
non-empty before creating the adapter (e.g., throw a clear error or exit with a
descriptive message if missing/invalid). Modify the initialization surrounding
PrismaPg and the adapter constant (the PrismaPg constructor call and the adapter
variable) to read DATABASE_URL into a local const, validate it (non-empty string
and optionally a basic URI check), and only pass the validated value into new
PrismaPg; if validation fails, surface a clear error referencing DATABASE_URL.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/db/client.tssrc/services/interview.service.tstests/Progress.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/services/interview.service.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Import updated to match new default export.The import change correctly aligns with the new default export of
prismafromsrc/db/client.ts. The business logic remains unchanged.tests/Progress.test.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM! Import path corrected to fix pipeline failure.The import path has been updated to correctly reference the
clientmodule, resolving the previous critical error whereCompletedQuestion(a Prisma model type) was incorrectly imported from theenumsmodule.src/db/client.ts (2)
9-11: LGTM! Client instantiation follows adapter pattern.The PrismaClient instantiation with the adapter and default export pattern is correct and aligns with the adapter-based Prisma setup.
1-3: Imports and adapter setup are correct and compatible.The
@prisma/adapter-pg(^7.2.0) and@prisma/client(^7.2.0) versions are compatible. The adapter is properly instantiated with the requiredconnectionStringoption from the environment variable, and the PrismaClient is correctly configured to use the adapter. No changes needed.
| const adapter = new PrismaPg({ | ||
| connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for DATABASE_URL environment variable.
The DATABASE_URL environment variable is used without validation. If it's undefined or invalid, the adapter initialization will fail at runtime, potentially with unclear error messages.
🔎 Proposed fix to add validation
+if (!process.env.DATABASE_URL) {
+ throw new Error("DATABASE_URL environment variable is not set");
+}
+
const adapter = new PrismaPg({
connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL,
});Alternatively, use a more defensive approach with a type assertion:
const adapter = new PrismaPg({
- connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL,
+ connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL as string,
});
+
+if (!process.env.DATABASE_URL) {
+ throw new Error("DATABASE_URL environment variable is not set");
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const adapter = new PrismaPg({ | |
| connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL, | |
| }); | |
| if (!process.env.DATABASE_URL) { | |
| throw new Error("DATABASE_URL environment variable is not set"); | |
| } | |
| const adapter = new PrismaPg({ | |
| connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL, | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @src/db/client.ts around lines 5-7, The code instantiates PrismaPg with
process.env.DATABASE_URL without validating it, so add a guard to check that
DATABASE_URL is present and non-empty before creating the adapter (e.g., throw a
clear error or exit with a descriptive message if missing/invalid). Modify the
initialization surrounding PrismaPg and the adapter constant (the PrismaPg
constructor call and the adapter variable) to read DATABASE_URL into a local
const, validate it (non-empty string and optionally a basic URI check), and only
pass the validated value into new PrismaPg; if validation fails, surface a clear
error referencing DATABASE_URL.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
CI
Tests
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.