Replies: 15 comments 6 replies
|
Wednesday May 27th - 15:00 UTC (17h in Madrid or Paris - 8h on US West coast) - work fine for us @jgarciahospital, @jpengar |
|
Hi @albertoramosmonagas - does May29th works for you? |
|
For me all options are currently possible |
|
@ReidErickson-TMO & I can do Wednesday, May 27th, as well. (Friday May 29th also works) @yyeAduna & @shilpa-padgaonkar can you add your availability? |
|
Meeting asked to the CAMARA support team |
|
May 22th and May 29 works for me the best; May 27 also works. |
|
Friday May 29th works for me. |
|
@bigludo7, let's go ahead and schedule for Friday, May 29th. |
|
I've request for the 27th but if OK for @albertoramosmonagas no pb to change to the 29th. We need to have all 'usual suspects' ;) |
|
Hi @bigludo7, If I had to choose between a Wednesday or a Friday, I’d prefer a Wednesday because, given the time of day, I think it might be more convenient; but if we can’t secure a venue for that session, I’d make the effort to attend on the 29th |
|
Thanks @albertoramosmonagas - appreciating the effort :) |
|
I will ask to LF team a change @shilpa-padgaonkar @KeldaAnders : any chance to get a yaml proposal from you to have some concrete bits to discuss? |
|
With the specific ageband, without any contamination from the check (swapped), and the retrieval date (monitored period and date) to be set as agreed in our last session... |
|
Hi @bigludo7, Regarding the session scheduled for this Friday, I wanted to check with you whether it still makes sense to hold it in its current form. From my understanding, one of the points agreed in the previous session was to have a pull request with a proposed YAML file available in advance, so that we could review it and use it as the basis for the discussion. As far as I know, this is not yet available. The only existing PR I am aware of is PR #254, which seems to be outdated and would probably need to be closed before creating a new one. Also, in the previous session, my understanding was that the agreed direction was to create a third endpoint focused only on the SIM swap band information. However, the current issue seems to discuss all endpoints together, which may make the discussion a bit broader than what we originally intended. At this stage, it seems that the main remaining topic to align on is how to define the band, based on the options proposed by Ludo. From Telefónica’s perspective, in the absence of a PR to review, the session may be more useful if it is focused specifically on discussing the implementation of the band. Otherwise, we wonder whether it may be better to wait until a concrete proposal is available. |
|
Hello @albertoramosmonagas Without a code contribution not sure the meeting is relevant. |
|
I share the same concern, and given that the session is scheduled late on a Friday, I think it would be better to make sure we have a clear and concrete topic to discuss. If the purpose is mainly to do a general check-in, we may already have the regular group sessions for that. Personally, I would prefer to wait until there is a more concrete proposal or material to review, so that bringing everyone together is more useful and the meeting can be as effective as possible. |
|
@bigludo7 apologies for the delay |
|
@bigludo7 @HuubAppelboom @albertoramosmonagas @ReidErickson-TMO @yyeAduna @shilpa-padgaonkar Thursday, June 4th - 15:00 UTC (17h in Madrid or Paris - 8h US West coast) |
|
For me Thursday 4th of June is ok |
|
The Thursday time works for me |
|
Hi @yyeAduna, @HuubAppelboom, @KeldaAnders, @ReidErickson-TMO, @shilpa-padgaonkar This discussion is closed. Please refrain from posting further comments here so as not to create unnecessary noise. @bigludo7 created a new thread to suggest dates: #264. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello
Some date proposal to discuss #260
All reactions