doc: better wording for process import

[tilwbr]

Have you...

• Added relevant entry to the change log?

[hyperspace-insights]

The PR makes a minor but correct documentation improvement — updating the CLI placeholder to be more descriptive. The only issue flagged is an inconsistency in placeholder casing/style (<process_definition_ID> uses mixed snake_case and PascalCase), where aligning with the kebab-case convention already used in other CLI placeholders in the same file (e.g., <sbpa-service-instance>) would make the docs more uniform.

PR Bot Information

Version: 1.20.4 | 📖 Documentation | 🚨 Create Incident | 💬 Feedback

• File Content Strategy: Full file content
• LLM: anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet
• Correlation ID: c40cd200-3354-11f1-92c5-e19c68714057
• Event Trigger: pull_request.opened

[hyperspace-insights]

Summary

The following content is AI-generated and provides a summary of the pull request:

---

Doc: Improve Process Import Command Clarity

Documentation

📝 Updated the wording in the README.md to improve clarity for the process import command.

Changes

• README.md: Renamed the --name argument placeholder from <Process_ID> to <process_definition_ID> to better reflect the expected value (a process definition ID) when importing an SBPA process as a CDS service.

---

• 🔄 Regenerate and Update Summary
• ✏️ Insert as PR Description (deletes this comment)
• 🗑️ Delete comment

PR Bot Information

Version: 1.20.4 | 📖 Documentation | 🚨 Create Incident | 💬 Feedback

• LLM: anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet
• Event Trigger: pull_request.ready_for_review
• Output Template: Default Template
• Summary Prompt: Default Prompt
• File Content Strategy: Full file content
• Correlation ID: ef471ac0-3354-11f1-83c7-3189b60e2f59

---

💌 Have ideas or want to contribute? Create an issue and share your thoughts with us!
📑 Check out the documentation for more information.
📬 Subscribe to the Hyperspace PR Bot DL to get the latest announcements and pilot features!

Made with ❤️ by Hyperspace.

[hyperspace-insights]

The existing comment already raises the concern about the casing/naming of <process_definition_ID>. No new issues to add beyond what's already flagged.

This is a minimal documentation-only PR that renames a placeholder in a CLI command example for clarity. The only open question is the exact casing of the new placeholder name, which has already been raised in the existing review comment.

PR Bot Information

Version: 1.20.4 | 📖 Documentation | 🚨 Create Incident | 💬 Feedback

• Correlation ID: ef471ac0-3354-11f1-83c7-3189b60e2f59
• Event Trigger: pull_request.ready_for_review
• File Content Strategy: Full file content
• LLM: anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet

[Kronprinz03]

LGTM