Skip to content

Conversation

@muskansethi1
Copy link
Contributor

@muskansethi1 muskansethi1 commented Apr 27, 2023

Update in documentation for asyncapi import

Copy link

@RamIndia RamIndia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks Good

@renejeglinsky
Copy link
Contributor

Is the note about OpenAPI in line 206 still valid?


| Option | Description |
| ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `--keep-namespace` | Keep the namespace of the existing service. Otherwise, the namespace is changed to the file's base name when converting the file to CSN.<br> **Note:** In this example, it would be still `API_BUSINESS_PARTNER`. |
Copy link
Contributor Author

@muskansethi1 muskansethi1 May 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where do you think that we should give a description of this option? @renejeglinsky

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall I felt, that we do have here a lot of reference content that maybe should find a home somewhere else. I'm not sure yet where that home would be. Having said that, I think that it's sufficient to have options documented in CLI help. Everything else is nice to have if it makes sense. So here, we don't use --keep-namespace anymore that's why I don't see the need to explain it here.

@muskansethi1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is the note about OpenAPI in line 206 still valid?

It's valid, I will edit it to make it more general

@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky merged commit a5de7ae into main May 3, 2023
@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky deleted the asyncapi-import branch May 3, 2023 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants