Missing testoutput

[kennethshsu]

What does this pull request do?

Addressed #713's missing test output

Relevent Github ticket(s)?

#713

---

Note

Low Risk
Low risk documentation-only change that adds expected doctest output for an existing example; no runtime logic is modified.

Overview
Adds the missing .. testoutput:: block to the Chainladder.fit docstring example so doctests/docs validation can assert the expected Chainladder() repr output.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 044e3a6. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 044e3a6. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Missing print() causes testoutput directive to fail

Medium Severity

The .. testcode:: block calls cl.Chainladder().fit(tr) without wrapping it in print(), but the new .. testoutput:: directive expects Chainladder() as output. Sphinx's testcode blocks only capture explicit stdout — unlike an interactive REPL, bare expressions don't produce output. Every other testcode/testoutput pair in this codebase (e.g. in triangle.py and benktander.py) uses print(). This test will fail.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 044e3a6. Configure here.}

[kennethshsu]

@genedan, would you mind moving all your branches under the main repo instead of working on your fork? That way I can write directly onto your branch.

Anyways, this PR addresses the one of the two recommendations by cursor in #713. The other recommendation is ok to ignore.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.25%. Comparing base (5e2bc69) to head (044e3a6).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #731   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.25%   85.25%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines        4952     4952           
  Branches      645      645           
=======================================
  Hits         4222     4222           
  Misses        521      521           
  Partials      209      209           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.25% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[genedan]

Will do. I actually hadn't realized I had permissions to do that until recently. Then I saw you do it, and found out I could do it too!