Skip to content

Audit post-v0.6.98 overlay changes before carrying forward #63

@cbusillo

Description

@cbusillo

Current Status

We stabilized locally on the known-good overlay-v0.6.98.1 baseline from PR #34 because recent post-#34 changes appear to have changed compaction/agent behavior.

Known-good anchor:

Current WIP from the compaction investigation was stashed locally as:

stash@{0}: On fix/auto-compact-overflow-resilience: wip auto compact overflow triage before v0.6.98 baseline

Goal

Audit every PR merged after #34 before carrying any change forward. For each PR or PR group, decide why it exists, what behavior it changed, whether the implementation is good, and whether to keep, rewrite, defer, or drop it.

Review Standard

For each PR/group, record:

  • Intent: What problem was it trying to solve?
  • Surface: What files and runtime paths did it touch?
  • Risk: Could it affect compaction, token pressure, agent behavior, auth, or repo workflow?
  • Verdict: keep as-is, keep with rewrite, defer, or drop.
  • Validation: What evidence proves the verdict?

Scope

Post-#34 PRs to audit include:

Acceptance Criteria

  • Baseline branch remains buildable and PATH code remains a known-good binary while auditing.
  • Each PR/group has a written keep/rewrite/defer/drop verdict.
  • Suspicious behavior changes, especially compaction/token history behavior, are reproduced or explained before reintroduction.
  • Only reviewed-good changes are reintroduced in clean focused PRs.
  • The current compaction WIP stash is either intentionally discarded or mined for useful tests/fixes after the audit.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    planDurable planning issueplan:activeCurrent active plan

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions