Skip to content

Mindstyle85 patch 1#1551

Merged
mindstyle85 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
mindstyle85-patch-1
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Mindstyle85 patch 1#1551
mindstyle85 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
mindstyle85-patch-1

Conversation

@mindstyle85
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 commented Apr 29, 2024

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated version information across different constants to reflect new app versions and their corresponding SHA values.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Reverted the latest version in mainnetVersions to ensure stability on the mainnet environment.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve version changes across different constants in the Vitepress project. The arabicaVersions constants now include a new app version "v1.8.0". The mainnetVersions constants revert to an older version "v1.7.0". Meanwhile, the mochaVersions constants upgrade to "v1.8.0". These adjustments ensure the project stays up-to-date with its versioning strategy.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.vitepress/constants/arabica_versions.js Updated to version "v1.8.0" with new SHA value.
.vitepress/constants/mainnet_versions.js Reverted to version "v1.7.0" with updated SHA value.
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js Updated from "v1.7.0" to "v1.8.0" with new SHA value.

🐇💻
A hop through code, a leap to new heights,
From v1.7.0 to v1.8.0, under digital lights.
Each version a carrot, dangling so sweet,
In the garden of Vitepress, where versions meet.
Cheers to updates, may bugs never bite!


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5024907 and abbe983.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .vitepress/constants/arabica_versions.js (1 hunks)
  • .vitepress/constants/mainnet_versions.js (1 hunks)
  • .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1)

2-3: Updated version tag and SHA appear correctly formatted.

Please ensure the SHA value corresponds accurately to the version tag in your version control or build system.

.vitepress/constants/arabica_versions.js (1)

2-3: Updated version tag and SHA appear correctly formatted.

Please ensure the SHA value corresponds accurately to the version tag in your version control or build system.

.vitepress/constants/mainnet_versions.js (1)

2-3: Updated version tag and SHA for rollback appear correctly formatted.

Please confirm that the rollback to an older version is intentional and ensure the SHA value corresponds accurately to the version tag in your version control or build system.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 29, 2024

PR Preview Action v1.4.7
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2024-04-29 12:53 UTC

@rootulp rootulp requested a review from jcstein April 29, 2024 12:00
Comment on lines +2 to +3
"app-latest-tag": "v1.7.0",
"app-latest-sha": "915847191e80d836f862eea2664949d9a240abea",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[question] why was mainnet already on v1.8.0?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nvm: #1539 looks like it was a mistake

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 merged commit a95f317 into main Apr 29, 2024
@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 deleted the mindstyle85-patch-1 branch April 29, 2024 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants