Glow it up!

[gbarros]

Overview

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @gbarros, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request marks a significant upgrade to the Celestia documentation, transitioning from VitePress to a more modern and flexible Next.js/Nextra platform. This migration not only restructures the entire content delivery system but also introduces enhanced features like interactive API documentation. The changes aim to provide a more intuitive and comprehensive resource for users, covering a broader range of topics and offering improved usability.

Highlights

• Documentation Platform Migration: The entire documentation site has been migrated from VitePress to a Next.js/Nextra framework, involving a complete overhaul of the underlying file structure and build process.
• New Interactive RPC Documentation: An interactive RPC documentation feature has been introduced, allowing users to explore Celestia Node API methods, view examples, and test requests directly within the documentation.
• Content Reorganization and Updates: Existing documentation content has been extensively reorganized and updated to fit the new Nextra structure, improving navigation and clarity across various topics related to Celestia.
• New Guides and Features: Several new guides have been added, including tutorials for Go and Rust clients, detailed explanations of 'Private Blockspace', new rollup stack integrations (Nitro DAS server, OP alt DA), and an IBC relayer setup guide.
• Development Workflow Enhancements: New Husky pre-push hooks have been added for linting, and the .gitignore file has been updated to reflect the new project dependencies and generated files for the Next.js environment.

Ignored Files

• Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (8)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
  • .github/workflows/latest_tags.yml
  • .github/workflows/link-check.yml
  • .github/workflows/lint.yaml
  • .github/workflows/preview.yaml
  • .github/workflows/preview.yml
  • .github/workflows/spellcheck.yml

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request represents a significant and impressive migration of the documentation site from VitePress to Next.js with Nextra. The new structure is much more organized, and the content has been thoroughly updated and expanded. The addition of an interactive RPC playground is a particularly valuable feature for developers. While the overall change is excellent, I have a few suggestions to address some information loss and inconsistencies introduced during this large-scale refactoring.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

README.md (9-131)

The new README.md is a generic Next.js boilerplate and omits the valuable project-specific information from the old version. The previous README contained important contribution guidelines, documentation standards, and setup instructions that are crucial for new and existing contributors. To ensure a smooth contribution process and maintain documentation quality, please port the relevant sections from the old README into the new one.

.github/.codespellignore (1-308)

This file, which contains a long list of technical terms to be ignored by the codespell spell checker, has been removed. Without this file, future pull requests are likely to have many false-positive spell check errors, creating unnecessary noise and friction for contributors. If codespell is still part of the CI pipeline, please consider restoring this file or ensuring these terms are ignored in the new configuration.

app/operate/getting-started/docker/page.mdx (76-80)

This section includes an option for a Full storage node. However, this node type appears to have been removed from other parts of the documentation, including the hardware requirements and other setup guides. To maintain consistency, it would be best to remove the Full node option from this guide as well.

app/operate/networks/mainnet-beta/page.mdx (60)

This sentence is a bit confusing as it seems to mix up square size (dimensions) with block size (storage capacity). For clarity, I suggest rephrasing to explicitly state the square dimensions and the resulting approximate block size. For example: "The current maximum square size on Mainnet Beta is 128x128, resulting in a block size of approximately 8 MiB."