Skip to content

fix(ci): fix broken nrpe packaging (#5991)#5993

Merged
tuntoja merged 3 commits intorelease-20260200from
CTOR-2204-fix-nrpe-packaging-job-release20260200
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): fix broken nrpe packaging (#5991)#5993
tuntoja merged 3 commits intorelease-20260200from
CTOR-2204-fix-nrpe-packaging-job-release20260200

Conversation

@tuntoja
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tuntoja tuntoja commented Feb 17, 2026

Community contributors

Description

Please include a short resume of the changes and what is the purpose of this pull request.
Any relevant information should be added to help reviewers to understand what are the stakes
of the pull request.

Fixes # (issue)
If you are fixing a github Issue already existing, mention it here.

Type of change

  • Patch fixing an issue (non-breaking change)
  • New functionality (non-breaking change)
  • Functionality enhancement or optimization (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (patch or feature) that might cause side effects breaking part of the Software

How this pull request can be tested ?

Please describe the procedure to verify that the goal of the PR is matched.
Provide clear instructions so that it can be correctly tested.

Any relevant details of the configuration to perform the test should be added.
To integrate this pull request into our core we need to add some automated tests to check the proper
functioning of this PR. Ideally we need the following informations:

  • SNMP: MIB files and full snmpwalk of enterprise branch (snmpwalk -ObentU -v 2c -c public address .1.3.6.1.4.1 > equipment.snmpwalk) or SNMP collections.
  • HTTP API (SOAP, Rest/Json, XML-RPC): the documentation and some curl examples (command with -v + output) or HTTP collections.
  • CLI: command line examples (command + result).
  • SQL: queries + results + column types or SQL collections.
  • JMX: mbean names and attributes.

If some information is confidential, such as logins or IP addresses, obfuscate them in what is sent
publicly and we'll get in touch with you by private message if this information is needed.

Checklist

  • I have followed the coding style guidelines provided by Centreon
  • I have commented my code, especially hard-to-understand areas of the PR.
  • I have rebased my development branch on the base branch (develop).
  • I have provide data or shown output displaying the result of this code in the plugin area concerned.

Centreon team (internal PR)

Description

PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE BRANCH PR INCLUDES JIRA TICKET ID

Please include a short resume of the changes and what is the purpose of this pull request.
Any relevant information should be added to help reviewers to understand what are the stakes
of the pull request.

Fixes # (issue)
If you are fixing a github Issue already existing, mention it here.
If you are fixing one or more JIRA ticket, mention it here too.

Type of change

  • Patch fixing an issue (non-breaking change)
  • New functionality (non-breaking change)
  • Functionality enhancement or optimization (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (patch or feature) that might cause side effects breaking part of the Software

How this pull request can be tested ?

Please describe the procedure to verify that the goal of the PR is matched.
Provide clear instructions so that it can be correctly tested.
Mention the automated tests included in this FOR (what they test like mode/option combinations).

Checklist

  • I have followed the coding style guidelines provided by Centreon
  • I have commented my code, especially hard-to-understand areas of the PR.
  • I have rebased my development branch on the base branch (develop).
  • In case of a new plugin, I have created the new packaging directory accordingly.
  • I have implemented automated tests related to my commits.
    • Data used for automated tests are anonymized.
  • I have reviewed all the help messages in all the .pm files I have modified.
    • All sentences begin with a capital letter.
    • All sentences end with a period.
    • I am able to understand all the help messages, if not, exchange with the PO or TW to rewrite them.
  • After having created the PR, I will make sure that all the tests provided in this PR have run and passed.

@tuntoja tuntoja requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2026 16:05
@tuntoja tuntoja requested review from Evan-Adam, kduret and mushroomempires and removed request for a team February 17, 2026 16:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsbf03037c-5601-4422-82bc-79e487e078a7

Fixed Issues (9)

Great job! The following issues were fixed in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/network/hp/athonet/nodeexporter/api/custom/api.pm: 131
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/network/hp/athonet/nodeexporter/api/custom/api.pm: 127
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/apps/monitoring/nodeexporter/linux/mode/cpu.pm: 193
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/apps/monitoring/nodeexporter/windows/mode/cpu.pm: 159
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/apps/monitoring/nodeexporter/linux/mode/traffic.pm: 148
MEDIUM Use_of_Broken_or_Risky_Cryptographic_Algorithm /src/apps/monitoring/nodeexporter/windows/mode/traffic.pm: 149
LOW Permissive_Regular_Expression /src/cloud/prometheus/exporters/nodeexporter/mode/uptime.pm: 125
LOW Permissive_Regular_Expression /src/cloud/prometheus/exporters/nodeexporter/mode/interfaces.pm: 83
LOW Permissive_Regular_Expression /src/cloud/prometheus/exporters/nodeexporter/mode/interfaces.pm: 83

@tuntoja tuntoja merged commit 251997f into release-20260200 Feb 17, 2026
25 of 30 checks passed
@tuntoja tuntoja deleted the CTOR-2204-fix-nrpe-packaging-job-release20260200 branch February 17, 2026 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants