Skip to content

CTOR-1895-plugin-os-linux-snmp-plugin-mode-tcpcon-add-force-rfc-option-to-allow-choosing-a-specific-rfc#6050

Merged
omercier merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
CTOR-1895-plugin-os-linux-snmp-plugin-mode-tcpcon-add-force-rfc-option-to-allow-choosing-a-specific-rfc
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

CTOR-1895-plugin-os-linux-snmp-plugin-mode-tcpcon-add-force-rfc-option-to-allow-choosing-a-specific-rfc#6050
omercier merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
CTOR-1895-plugin-os-linux-snmp-plugin-mode-tcpcon-add-force-rfc-option-to-allow-choosing-a-specific-rfc

Conversation

@scresto31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@scresto31 scresto31 commented Mar 17, 2026

Description

Add --force-rfc option to OS::Linux::SNMP mode tcpcon

Fixes # CTOR-1895

Type of change

  • Patch fixing an issue (non-breaking change)
  • New functionality (non-breaking change)
  • Functionality enhancement or optimization (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (patch or feature) that might cause side effects breaking part of the Software

Summary by Aikido

Security Issues: 0 Quality Issues: 0 Resolved Issues: 0

⚡ Enhancements

  • Added --force-rfc option to allow selecting specific RFC handling
  • Modified connection building to respect force_rfc option and choose RFC

📚 Documentation

  • Updated copyright year in file header to 2026-Present

More info

@scresto31 scresto31 self-assigned this Mar 17, 2026
@scresto31 scresto31 requested review from a team as code owners March 17, 2026 12:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsf97d1cf8-3c5d-4e6b-aa0b-346afb6637a0

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@omercier omercier merged commit 22719b3 into develop Mar 23, 2026
271 checks passed
@omercier omercier deleted the CTOR-1895-plugin-os-linux-snmp-plugin-mode-tcpcon-add-force-rfc-option-to-allow-choosing-a-specific-rfc branch March 23, 2026 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants